From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enable-local-variables 'maybe Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:50:58 +0200 Message-ID: <7458-Sat16Feb2002095058+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <200202152027.g1FKR2R09651@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013846799 21989 195.204.10.66 (16 Feb 2002 08:06:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Feb 2002 08:06:39 GMT Cc: roland.winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16bzri-0005iZ-00 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:06:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bzfd-00066X-00; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from heimdall.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.17]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bze5-00063A-00; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretsky (diup-219-63.inter.net.il [213.8.219.63]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BFD76866; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:52:28 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <200202152027.g1FKR2R09651@aztec.santafe.edu> (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:27:02 -0700 (MST)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1194 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1194 > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:27:02 -0700 (MST) > From: Richard Stallman > > Doesn't jit-lock, for example, display a message about stealth > fontification (as an optional feature)? > > I don't know. I don't understand those words. Is the message an > optional feature, or is stealth fontification the optional feature > you refer to? Both are optional features, but I meant the former: you can ask stealth fontification to print messages when it does its thing. In other words, my concern is that disallowing messages in code run from timers will hurt many features, such as jit-stealth-lock. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel