From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: tags-loop-continue Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:53:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7321a48d-1b17-45eb-8863-d0ee42ebece0@default> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <5b7c961c-e5ff-4ca2-bb26-dfc1d1e60d7f@default> <56926C23.6000708@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452448471 26619 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2016 17:54:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 18:54:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKC2-0002Px-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:54:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48277 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKC1-000577-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKBm-00053S-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:54:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKBl-0003ka-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:24955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKBf-0003jZ-9G; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u0AHrq5V023216 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:53:53 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0AHrqvs026706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:53:52 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0AHrqiF006200; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:53:52 GMT In-Reply-To: <56926C23.6000708@yandex.ru> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.81 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197986 Archived-At: > > What makes you "fairly sure" of that? FWIW, my own guess > > is that `A' and `Q' in Dired are heavily used. (As they > > should be.) >=20 > They could be used, but apparently not in conjunction with > tags-loop-continue. >=20 > Just how much time has passed since we've given the tags-loop-continue's > binding to xref-pop-marker-stack before this question has come up? >=20 > And we're not talking about it because a user complained. We're > discussing it because we've been reminded of it while updating the > documentation. That's poor reasoning, IMO. How many users have used `xref-pop-marker-stack'? The absence of user complaints during a period when the thing about which you are counting complaints is not even present in a release is hardly something to go by. _Zero_ time has passed since Emacs has been released with your new feature. _You_, as its developer, might be zealously impatient and feel that a long time has passed, but in fact no time has passed at all. Your feature has not even been released to users.