From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71179: [PATCH] In rgrep, check matching files before excluding files Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 17:47:49 +0300 Message-ID: <7308511a-b031-44f9-8460-2b5d85739bcb@gutov.dev> References: <86jzji1jpe.fsf@gnu.org> <864jamyrzy.fsf@gnu.org> <861q5qyoz4.fsf@gnu.org> <86zfsex9mq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18314"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: 71179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Spencer Baugh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 25 16:49:14 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sAsht-0004XT-Hh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 May 2024 16:49:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sAshb-0003mP-VO; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:48:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sAsha-0003lt-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sAsha-0001on-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sAshh-0002GA-TH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 14:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 71179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71179.17166484908552 (code B ref 71179); Sat, 25 May 2024 14:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2024 14:48:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sAsgr-0002Dr-H3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from wfout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.144]:43997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sAsgp-0002DR-1w for 71179@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6241C000BF; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:47:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 25 May 2024 10:47:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1716648473; x=1716734873; bh=JuqA3cWV3ixhXY+9EpU9fRrKKFW4ayOUh3WqVhyo0vk=; b= DPL3n0ijgN/Qmhnl3gNsU6lDVDKh3wBiBp4767Vpuv6xQaGXx2aAlkL/aJKmzO+W 2AaaqLTM9zo1qjKcBxPrfj8CrUHN1dhdIjOKNG//euiqalUCTsj6V7BZAH3bnIsl nZTekH37cA9sjBbInRUmKnoYgJ1/Kjh8fAl6VsaIVvXcNHgXDa1hss7p6gMIgWMc Xplm9bwjvhShObjLB4RFwLHtg44HLeb1casURcp/WssRds9x/t41KRZ37prYkX8e waVsvxIQEQ/k7sJ7fzNlHkPuvOeY+PYUfoKZdKSP85C6PGw6F9nCcW3Lsi7pYk37 GOtnpyv4bjMFdxoQR+E3YQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1716648473; x= 1716734873; bh=JuqA3cWV3ixhXY+9EpU9fRrKKFW4ayOUh3WqVhyo0vk=; b=b FviDUoF8YuvLp0IrqmeWRipQjFvhLUKAOy1E9iqijlemy5hLwPkKlpXB5oWr09Kr y/pfRxu1QP6meLMgTaaApOE5aFpJ2XE8tnT0e3S5ILtct4jGkIR/yTFKlgXpCXdH zLRld1A7+1O9mpeTLcYeSbvfM6gKqsbcJ4A0AEXu1MoIpvAsYaspcMzYsBRm73kV uaGcNVie6K95yNq2EX1viU2Eyj9aG6psF/5Mef/8C0wN5MFaEjBexnFJvCYH6MuW ULVTjBE9U11M92RXvhMDLzo0oNW2M5oPsfNQJ0ZaMTWFZFvoB13qkyBHZMNprsZv qgpVLneTM/CUhvevIso5w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdejtddgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepteduleejgeehtefgheegjeekueehvdevieekueeftddvtdevfefhvdevgedu jeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 25 May 2024 10:47:51 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86zfsex9mq.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:285882 Archived-At: On 25/05/2024 17:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> What other possibilities? > Who knows? Why risk any changes at all? > > Anyway, I suggested an approach that should leave everyone happy. Why > are we still arguing? New option has the usual problems: * What to call it. * General proliferation of new options makes it harder to find each one. * Several days of arguing whether we can make the new behavior the default one.