From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11354: 24.1.50; long lines (214 chars!) in files.el Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:49:43 -0700 Message-ID: <72FB36942C374D8EA274DB5DADA41BDD@us.oracle.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335466217 4553 80.91.229.3 (26 Apr 2012 18:50:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11354@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 26 20:50:16 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTlZ-0000GY-CU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:50:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45166 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTlY-0004Z2-Pw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTlV-0004Sw-Kh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTlT-000084-GG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTlT-00006r-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTmQ-0000Hu-Ba for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11354 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11354-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11354.13354662541092 (code B ref 11354); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2012 18:50:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTmH-0000HY-Sj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:49403) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNTmF-0000HK-SR for 11354@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q3QInjGc016444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:49:46 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3QIni7m002285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:49:45 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt113.oracle.com (abhmt113.oracle.com [141.146.116.65]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q3QInidi002308; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:49:44 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:49:44 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac0j2qKDrf858Vk1QCOILU+WnRBY5AAAZELw In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59535 Archived-At: > In order to do better, you need to use `concat', cut it into logical > units, properly indented, ... +1 - That's fine too. The ideal need not be the enemy of the good, however. Shortening either way means autofitting will not be neutralized perversely, which is a good thing. I can understand if someone agrees that shortening such extreme lines is desirable, but is not a high priority. But classifying this suggestion as `won't fix' instead of `wishlist' says in effect that Emacs Dev does NOT think that shortening such lines is desirable, that it prefers them as they are. If this had been classified as `wishlist' instead of `won't fix' I would not have replied at all.