From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bingham, Jay" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: Possible emacs bug. Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:34:08 -0600 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <72A87F7160C0994D8C5A36E2FDC227F503C68EA5@txnexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037810245 14443 80.91.224.249 (20 Nov 2002 16:37:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18EXqu-0003ko-00 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:37:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18EXoy-0004q3-00; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:35:24 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18EXnq-0004C5-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18EXnn-0004BN-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com ([161.114.32.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18EXnn-0004BB-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:34:11 -0500 Original-Received: from cacexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net (cacexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.105.250.119]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3215247D; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:34:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from txnexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.74.7.244]) by cacexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:34:09 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Possible emacs bug. Thread-Index: AcKQlmAwvzAH6RTnTJaJ+KyDcIcGVwAHBhbw Original-To: "Charlie" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2002 16:34:09.0745 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6D68410:01C290B2] Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:3803 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:3803 This "feature" is present in emacs 20.4 running under Unix as well. -_ J_) C_)ingham . HP - NonStop Austin Software & Services - Software Quality = Assurance . Austin, TX . Language is the apparel in which your thoughts parade in public. . Never clothe them in vulgar and shoddy attire. -Dr. George W. = Crane- -----Original Message----- From: Charlie [mailto:charlieb@zoom.co.uk]=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:19 AM To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Possible emacs bug. I have discovered a "feature" but I strongly suspect I am not the first. Using emacs 21.2.1 on win32 and the version with debian woody in = lisp-mode the lisp-eval-defun (M-C-x) does not eval the defun if the indenetation = is incorrect. example: (defun badly-indented () (+ 2 3)) =3D> 5 (defun correctly-indented () (+ 2 3)) =3D> correctly-indented This works in a number of inferior lisps like clisp and cmucl and in = both normal lisp mode and ilisp. How can I find out if this has been reported and if not report it? Cheers Charlie. _______________________________________________ Help-gnu-emacs mailing list Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs