From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34849: Compilation issues with g++ on some files Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:53:57 +0200 Message-ID: <72359669-2058-916d-bbd6-dfbb2b95d0fe@yandex.ru> References: <8736nqzdfe.fsf@gmail.com> <874l82krcs.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7hsm9zj.fsf@gmail.com> <838sxbuxn5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="200546"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 34849@debbugs.gnu.org, agrambot@gmail.com To: rms@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 20 11:55:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YsU-000q0e-3g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:55:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46058 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YsT-0001YR-3S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YsK-0000ia-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YsB-0000sO-7N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YsA-0000ry-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YsA-0002tX-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34849 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 34849-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34849.155307925011060 (code B ref 34849); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34849) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2019 10:54:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YrJ-0002sK-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com ([209.85.208.176]:44784) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6YrH-0002rr-B1 for 34849@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id n18so1789495ljg.11 for <34849@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 03:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nCRBpDKbaDCZ3WIMAGnMMF+9DCsPfNSqPvYKkJyQ/OE=; b=eio7426wEfPbYnFnFGFta/ZLK2HX05I10on+vtjteoOdL5A68s1QKDzGXq6zalAbqW QaAZfTnYuRjdLaLJJuPiV4GItwAdGUSNqFkE6KTulOkUoKkVJUz1vWKCBH7qwkgYmaxs 0GeZLW7adyswlUSngQEtqWi6OqMDD8C1gWlWwpO6UYi4UMghbB731HJRxHu+wKBnEJub e8MvCEPkc9zP2yClzmrNb3wfmKvJSYigb3elQXjqn2Pi0VdUXsrj77kZtLFZms4fdFtg DdWzETyVNCM3No2ktVZqqQYhXWr8wFz+a8nMAZarEW4LWF/Q49HX6JKpT64O343ostZJ WQcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nCRBpDKbaDCZ3WIMAGnMMF+9DCsPfNSqPvYKkJyQ/OE=; b=BajHdiaUO40Q1WYKNa+A73iNTNIIgb78B6I8SC/v3jpYxiyxgXFEMhcQrjzJQW7oFq qF9fiueVgCg3bxF2yl9jLJqVKSpmIPka/sTaB9aBhKJJVTP5fouBbPFDCIpJGrY1a8Bs 52DIogjRTMbChcoG7F9AYLWL4cL2vssvGcx0BOiGdvK7BnisHaF98yROdTTJYzR4Ba4n E7LgIMppy1vOlmsn10RCfOQnSKbW/vhDoPjdU3s/H9u5+kdOyqbDBqXCYBTDQNE4lltA TYt/rJT/gw4m/GP8tb5sYd8aS2fc8aY6q8QlGhS0HSHnqbfE6G5NdwgGTbMpSoZNWu4H Tycw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVvXKS5L2QHUEbzrbdszwavpqB30ZTowaqn/PqQOSB9EbBIfk65 qbCm/BdVd2bODpRyYFDPlu4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyRF4SbAkH1dsmPIVQp9eEfF1THDgp5Tk+7Pkuss2MdE3UpWGGNOYGednOu9jaizpCqj/GhQw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:20b:: with SMTP id 11mr16928799ljc.41.1553079241434; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 03:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p10sm306245lfk.35.2019.03.20.03.53.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 03:54:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156540 Archived-At: On 20.03.2019 4:32, Richard Stallman wrote: > That reasoning could be valid if we were dealing with computers only. > However, Emacs's users are humans. If they form a habit, they will > oppose changing it. > > I don't want there to be humans who insist that Emacs should stay > under GPL v3 so it can continue to be linked with Qt. The same users could argue for Qt to change the license, couldn't they?