From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding. Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <718e93ef-f2a7-4272-9bd9-31b482409bc8@default> References: <20200419004503.26161.91884@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200419004504.C65772049B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <026ef78c-3c5e-4fd8-8161-0cc2cf5771c0@default> <87o8rc2w6p.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="77625"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Stefan Kangas , Emacs developers To: Michael Heerdegen , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 17:33:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTSEr-000K2v-HK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:33:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTSEq-0006fi-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTSDl-0005v1-IX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTSDk-0007Io-3R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:45428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTSDj-0007EQ-I5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03SFJKSt181597; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:32:25 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=Oumn5yVATdhFG2eg/FZnN1hnbOg7wWtFgPKuTjYhubk=; b=mJiKbHIZyBC5j5dX/og9QSiBf17UdVAI/eGaAb/1T4udHgERf3adZT5ccs6/3Rh8bhl8 VrsgfZIjI7nrZavXGO58J14nTJcvoMZugxz/QXOXZVSwPNnLGQZusg48RBOXTeL9LhmV AgImPwaQmogDrUwvKpNsvs/NBXp7EdA5a3rlBlECIyXIZ5y2L2dC8WquTJWihzTq9cQn vo2v19Ps4qQUrWRE69lloHbUYOladgqixgZZQCsPRpoe9i1XPtHDags04Ojxp+P7jC6I QexDrrQJ76NboFGh8L445j4PrwedQpS3YRxV8p0cd48uCzRnz0p933RZ/1g/kz+8NjFA 0A== Original-Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30p01nq7t8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:32:25 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03SFVt1J090656; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:32:24 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30mxx02ajr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:32:22 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03SFWHAH023339; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:32:20 GMT In-Reply-To: <87o8rc2w6p.fsf@web.de> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4993.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9605 signatures=668686 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=823 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004280121 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9605 signatures=668686 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=872 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004280120 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.86; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2130.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/28 11:32:26 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.86 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248028 Archived-At: > Since RESULT is deprecated anyway, and there were no strong opinions > against that, I would like to turn that warning into a warning that > always happens when you use RESULT saying "warning: argument RESULT in > dotimes is deprecated" or so. Why was RESULT deprecated? RESULT is good enough for Common Lisp. Why isn't it good enough for Elisp? Just curious. http://clhs.lisp.se/Body/m_dotime.htm