From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59935: 29.0.60; project-list-buffers is slow Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:41:40 +0200 Message-ID: <70602760-546c-0c7c-b4a9-fdfe8d2c4e5e@yandex.ru> References: <86a63vi2lu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4a78ffcc-15fb-27ac-48b9-82fe84c596aa@yandex.ru> <86bko9na29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bko9u8yy.fsf@gnu.org> <0c3df029-1e0b-7965-59c2-062018a0af7a@yandex.ru> <838rjdu7np.fsf@gnu.org> <3eb92bd5-7552-0529-19a7-b9db315b382a@yandex.ru> <83359lu5o6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40306"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Cc: 59935@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 11 20:42:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p4SDK-000AJ5-A3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 20:42:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4SD8-0007AR-9Y; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4SD5-00079z-37 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:42:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4SD4-0003cF-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4SD4-0002GL-74 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59935.16707877108690 (code B ref 59935); Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2022 19:41:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4SCr-0002G6-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:41:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:46030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4SCq-0002G0-Ph for 59935@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:41:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id n9-20020a05600c3b8900b003d0944dba41so3486962wms.4 for <59935@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 11:41:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S18gVOiB3rGze28PozOShVwafsBZtQqROi5r6soM4R8=; b=qXm3vfAFnRlue8tVCe5Zj2rW2+FnF+7keV4kOVb2mr1rf8IehHSPxKyWL8XdKQbrHp lq8vIV/Np7o3+RB1rPoaYub+hHLE63SBWRTIrofVYddA0DOBZAGMtfiDK3aSGmggsz+p p3rxscmZy09JbfskX2xVeqNvaggDlFz+sGGuRr/fXler5qO3cpINQeatk3ig/KDedEhm sIVmtk8B4LL3qFtBCTTXiiEGeaSt7EOLe3A/TBcwhVdGJdxmWW4izEHrgQ+MN4SkxT3C QEaXNMRqb1D/VjnAkQWZckfOf+hFga8SPyhHPdYq5YL20QpyLs70YjESHudu6FFWif5H fqIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=S18gVOiB3rGze28PozOShVwafsBZtQqROi5r6soM4R8=; b=Grfs7QSC6n6yz+Uo6loGNAwMpbaknF+h41H5TtF7HRsFLwueatBwj+W41ymjHiQOv3 uQCFRxCnDMltHC9EjrFYP/64z7uGkF6gKqA0+Xs4jUaEPfPMK+5tUqLWEXnEXU60XK+W 6bki4WanSZZPJaFJym3mIc07Pzw9L8CjA8thaIwckNfFzQrm5SeecVcBghJoW1N3d4gu icJhZSycvVqtk16i5hcvWzTWCm6rndg4X8mDTbGsbkV/VFZky1FdfgMKbf8MdXTrthA5 t70Mb9e8tttlDEq6h1z/weNvkbgNX25CGMYAVmrbIT5SE6IX9Oq0N0RC5qys785i+WiH 5adg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plyHBCdhCgooHB0Xfru5OB4myOC5cmf4176gT4m/q4qVLVw/oOo 7gLoC0NSrDq8RpFDnDiZPkE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5eCI3DBG1D1ZdmtfXroKcjgYSDUoLWDEqtxa1rSaGqvwsJ4IGMk6m5NueqRxwBTH+MuRO0hg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f14:b0:3cf:e91d:f263 with SMTP id l20-20020a05600c4f1400b003cfe91df263mr10419201wmq.4.1670787702887; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 11:41:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n22-20020a05600c3b9600b003cfd0bd8c0asm7193193wms.30.2022.12.11.11.41.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Dec 2022 11:41:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83359lu5o6.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250653 Archived-At: On 11/12/2022 21:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Otherwise, this change could be split into two steps: >> >> - Rollback that signature to pre-commit 125b5684c (i.e. revert its part >> in buff-menu.el). This is something we usually considered to be safe. >> >> - Add new change that allows BUFFER-LIST to be a function. > We can do it safer, so I'd prefer that. I don't like that idea because we'll leave an unproven new feature in the codebase, without any known callers or requestors. That's just extra complexity, with all associated long-term costs. But you're the boss. It's better to fix this than not, obviously.