From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: where to send patches Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:50:43 -0500 Message-ID: <6goc5kcbu4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87y652bt1a.fsf@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299700395 28155 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2011 19:53:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Rottmann , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 20:53:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPRS-00086w-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:53:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxPRR-00081O-IC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52371 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxPPB-0006cA-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPPA-00005P-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:50:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPPA-00005J-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51098) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPPA-0004NH-7k; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:50:44 -0500 X-Spook: Defcon president security Iran basement World Trade X-Ran: Aw$p^1s:\PLBg9Ch"7og]|*qPG-tZE_aoe!/E1E5ErEHv|{7WKJ6g>I#.B]RW+/@?>FXz: X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:05:16 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136984 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > Agreed. It occurred to me that we could even tweak M-x report-emacs-bug > so that it notices when the report includes something that looks like > a patch, and adds the corresponding debbugs tag. People like to use this damn [PATCH] convention, so some time ago I tweaked debbugs.gnu.org to recognize that in the same way as "Tags: patch". I did think about adding "Severity: normal" to the M-x report-emacs-bug boilerplate, and inviting people to adjust it if they wished. But maybe it makes reporting more complicated for little gain?