From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Variable-width font indentation Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:55:14 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <6f26604a-f975-ee86-c189-ab674febc695@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87inaiss6l.fsf@web.de> <8bc3c4c7-dfc7-987a-95e7-bd309e2326c6@cs.ucla.edu> <03118DC0-39DA-4AB5-980E-A33809B9A5EE@raeburn.org> <83vaeas8uz.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgf6s3aa.fsf@gnu.org> <838tb5rxoe.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgf5q73p.fsf@gnu.org> <4742f0ae-86b5-48f9-4601-4dbba9e6380d@gmail.com> <83bmfzreaq.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgf3przh.fsf@gnu.org> <42d0c18b-8d14-bfe2-8f09-112787e8b0b4@gmail.com> <83zi3io9tr.fsf@gnu.org> <859ec725-acc3-22e4-ca26-28108c3e5e26@gmail.com> <83sh9ao086.fsf@gnu.org> <83muzhodkx.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2otumg6.fsf@gnu.org> <015c9878-2955-5ef9-cb05-a066b59c085f@cs.ucla.edu> <83o9jxueu5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520632481 5710 195.159.176.226 (9 Mar 2018 21:54:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 21:54:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 22:54:37 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1euPyG-0001NV-VY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 22:54:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euQ0J-0005gd-M3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:56:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euPz1-0005cR-Ql for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:55:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euPz1-0004Vr-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:55:23 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:48682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euPyv-0004Ph-MO; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DD41616D1; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:55:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id PMVoEwc0N3si; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:55:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3C71616D2; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:55:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id SYQRJaZ5CUUB; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:55:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [47.154.30.119]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96D0E1616D1; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:55:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83o9jxueu5.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223560 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I've tried it and it flies for me, and it doesn't appear that I'm alone >> in this opinion. > I'm not alone in my opinion, either. I've heard other opinions that the approach is not to their taste. But I haven't heard anyone else say that the approach should not be available, even as a user option.