From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#75292: 31.0.50; igc: (file-error "Doing vfork" "Bad address") Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:29 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <6f1070fd-b2c8-47c6-a8b8-26325d620cb4@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87pll5qexm.fsf@localhost> <86zfk9hxje.fsf@gnu.org> <87h66hqcqh.fsf@localhost> <86ttahhv4m.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23142"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: 75292@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 02 20:42:19 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tTR5G-0005s2-Lk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:42:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTR52-0002l1-AD; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTR51-0002kn-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:42:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTR50-0002RN-OY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:42:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=In-Reply-To:From:References:MIME-Version:Date:To:Subject; bh=sKIpkfrgIX7b4tzBX3dhglD7XfeJ7GNQkmHl8P/Rj2g=; b=nGuv1VevQj/Vx4Ma6dBPnaKMle9wbJQ8FgMOlgK0Bp1spXfH5zbyT4LJpoHZrmWtL3sbEqEfgh9Man45vZKSpq9i3jQW6l/LCBIPhk1YOwyIyM9a9bItCyOda7H8ykbg/IHlzhvHo4zKWXri4FEZm4d5BJ9ShOEMRHUDKjzoQZldt/yIEaaaRTJHOER4pR8TVt8DJO1qneH/TjBjC+6H+rjwr1gFCSJBL9Hi3gkHjkHEVuoOoULjeH0S6ES7jyrv8FCNXQb7Bvc/xsVi5//uGAojQgD5FrlJD7WulKUYvOebsch7tcPkRsNw+enYdpCLzFml/Rp+BY5Do15pUeUPnQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTR4z-0003qc-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 75292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75292.173584689814743 (code B ref 75292); Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 75292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2025 19:41:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTR4c-0003pi-5n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:41:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.66]:33052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTR4a-0003pG-2y for 75292@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:41:36 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543A73C123879; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP id UOsuWBPnx3lO; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6E33C12387B; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 0A6E33C12387B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu; s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1735846890; bh=sKIpkfrgIX7b4tzBX3dhglD7XfeJ7GNQkmHl8P/Rj2g=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=Hnep/u7mrSIOnTIPxvHTDEd53+rbx//fMhwdQLnJQffxHz8isO3/+k2riYiQCXgYv P7SLCjwXsXboH/nqWXMBnDLyZq4+Y0KhWNUomHc3YKFctmqNEwu+zFBi31jVVB5Hxj FvZ18GmwKYvYHop2KJ/g+dtUNPRdGvc04VZl6vu1YamGC+/eQkZ1auQ1wYSeyzkneN ph4ESggMH+HciQHSuqBU+cfYMxwEx/68Wu4VTdmo1PgbUws7l3K7akMjKhbauh7S59 yPeMxno1oZ167gmRVSqGHOh01LOwCeUfyf5IwYPOwacWq9tkppOvoIXAutpJ3duyZr sQdrDwX+R+acw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id aFa6D2B5P6RZ; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.254.12] (unknown [47.154.28.214]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E05663C123879; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86ttahhv4m.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298226 Archived-At: On 2025-01-02 11:29, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (file-error "Doing vfork" "Bad address") >>>> (call-process-shell-command "grep -anE '^:(Sourc.URL\\+?):[ \11[]+https://curiouscoding\\.nl/posts/static-search-tree/[]]*$' '/home/yantar92/Org/rss_archive_2019.org'" nil t) ... > Could it be that this started happening when we began using > posix_spawn instead of vfork? If Emacs uses posix_spawn instead of vfork, shouldn't file-error report "Doing posix_spawn" instead of "Doing vfork"? Truth in advertising and all that....