From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25117: 25.1.90; Result of called-interactively-p differs WRT file contents Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 21:09:42 +0100 Message-ID: <6dfbb12e-aaad-d090-7c5b-c7516834ae3f@easy-emacs.de> References: <5cd2a353-4594-52bd-6a70-7efa5145e2f3@easy-emacs.de> <87wpfez6vu.fsf@web.de> <01a3dabd-7fc1-7fe7-c066-15b0c02008d5@easy-emacs.de> <87vauycny9.fsf@web.de> <87r35mcm23.fsf@web.de> <2fa5d878-bb33-dd57-3a52-c6b7779cf15b@easy-emacs.de> <8a4cf1ca-0c91-47a5-fe70-afac35fbe08d@easy-emacs.de> <6b47eed5-c31a-7b44-5d87-9d7768606ef7@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480968136 11227 195.159.176.226 (5 Dec 2016 20:02:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:02:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 25117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 21:02:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzSj-0001XD-IT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:02:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzSn-0002yS-8o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:02:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzSh-0002yB-CX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzSc-00049E-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzSc-000498-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzSb-0001Ug-SU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 20:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 25117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25117.14809680635665 (code B ref 25117); Mon, 05 Dec 2016 20:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2016 20:01:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57291 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzRe-0001TI-H6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.133]:60251) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDzRc-0001Sh-OG for 25117@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:01:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([95.119.229.206]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue004 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LsdeH-1cg9IV47ar-012KRn; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:00:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:L3TQFzEwkHj1Xz1MDqfodlk0tfxFh2HfaYdWxR00iqvS+zlk4+w ymp1D7v8oc2CBbXXx7PFTudbuhs+YYVu3MvVJaNHk0LbLddF/ce4ba6PjYEWJ+/LQ9TDC9U Rsyr/KpatieWd7r5H36a3zLqKgx4+j5ANjXFoeoWXb/TjbcWUBWYAaWjQ0jCYlzym65G25p 1QiK/BvynI/96cbFNUj+A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kGAGxdiU5f0=:8WakMdiEEmwYkevtW1M3yH CsskW5JbFhcI3XRZ/paoGg1QpunXzr1VOzR0ictML20zHL2b7fvUe+/zohCwZ3aGGr9hoGTTK 98zb0tWuGLI326qo4qNNNPhXrHIPLFkfm2yx6RY2FXM+Pgqewy57R/S1yk0b5gHT9fsnoR/0K Te0zp0he1KtjHAeufV0ZmcggVTUslwYdaqDYkPCaiX3VtBFZBPQlLLgEAgoyzF2jnBLEoaLtG FAxu7ct3Upmf327srj2X1LduDEGAqJ51z9ZOD6SFCqLS//LaOINKVCaSPyLkU4UnX3zQn5cuA 72Elnb9MabPFyKaPVJdNhVl3LWd1lU+sPKdq0+u2yZ6FWZy3PrUd2hQ1Go3f9b+rx+9e+zkvO EqjgaWzDJ+UhEy7c5ZG0JQwfGTzcaBZ4hBMOC/ifx/ZLDQ7NbbsJ0LTQWNqZ5YW2I8M5bo7gt w6q4qrNzI93XvIX6ekTEUNj9fkQ/8OFXre/eT/HVOBEwBHgaJmfExZJoiRDzOJNRpPSgoil+4 nIzbwAo9j0xRSezTPQg/vmh4Gj8sGBoLQXtD0LdAtRp2ti09W2k+Je7H4eiNLFHBHCL0lmx18 HeEI2BnApowR9JoxFHZrJuNSa24mN+iMmP0satiUdMBOKLRKtgsQx95d2x0uaIn7x7g1kmdSp ONPxtU6V5xHf+sFlHNruhko/BfmznM/2u4oD76WtwYaPLmnIDmOSWywSE2g5FcnQZoYShRQXt bksZ3Ym5L6TnlQkB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126528 Archived-At: On 05.12.2016 20:51, Noam Postavsky wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Andreas Röhler > wrote: >> >> On 05.12.2016 20:34, Noam Postavsky wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Andreas Röhler >>> wrote: >>>>> The difference is lexical-binding: t, also happens at least as far back >>>>> as >>>>> 24.3. >>>> >>>> Not sure about that. Checked with and without lexical-binding. Seems not >>>> making the difference. See png attached - with emacs -Q checked earlier >>>> and >>>> same result. >>> The text doesn't make the difference, it's the buffer-local value of >>> the lexical-binding variable that matters. >>> >>> Having the text in the file affects the value indirectly, see >>> >>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Specifying-File-Variables.html >> >> Hmm, don't understand. The lexical-binding is t in both files, set in first >> line. But example foo behaves differently. > My guess is that you typed in "lexical-binding: t" after you opened > "eil.el". Yes, typed and M-x eval-buffer. > Try it again after running M-x normal-mode in that buffer Okay, when opening with lb to t inside already, under edebug the error shows up here too. Thanks!