From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:51:13 +0300 Message-ID: <6cdc9514-7fad-51d2-3420-af65558c3cbe@gutov.dev> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87a5uw9ivs.fsf@posteo.net> <87ttt42gna.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmy080kn.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8djcydl.fsf@gnu.org> <87350ndquw.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83350ncbns.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmxj27fn.fsf@dfreeman.email> <831qfrptiq.fsf@gnu.org> <57429221-d9be-5791-e975-b3539905e2f6@gutov.dev> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34175"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Danny Freeman , Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel , Manuel Uberti To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 27 12:52:23 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qaDNW-0008cU-Kn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 12:52:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaDMd-0006JT-H5; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 06:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaDMb-0006J5-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 06:51:25 -0400 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaDMY-0000Df-Fh; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 06:51:25 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EE632002E2; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 06:51:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 27 Aug 2023 06:51:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1693133477; x=1693219877; bh=07fknWv64NXAM00/ClDlnNZZGYVqDlLo87q T7xlG9z0=; b=hHnYZKqb8JujeLB4J6fCrgXc3n+hmoHigkx7JaSQo/YE+WNAy1g QKUpF+j0wdFPLXIygzDkIaNy6NTznAe6SjDnjg6aTeqESvA6TsHQ/iXKOsjvLYP6 +a/PM4XIbrYF8tqpl9tIJxpHyCN0By3hmbTR+CsFtI9L1rxg+/J+Q6S8Jko6desv 0SgJOBJgCOnT0y4pT4zFS1ap64of7RnonWf7IZ/smDVD07FeWQD2IKeQZXDUx01r a1edeSRRR+OOxz/fy28cQys3MOUm+uowPNzBGz/Rwoq6aJvZzwtW/XfO5CyVRcZb /yS6AgnO0iEpZU+DcNSunvW6rNKpG6688lw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1693133477; x=1693219877; bh=07fknWv64NXAM00/ClDlnNZZGYVqDlLo87q T7xlG9z0=; b=fbKY1uosl7oOmhhOt91e3TRVtMVprcY3grcOwld0AkRQFJ80DCG p76nj05IXvsF1OKRZNVVPsHiMxEjsTh26yxxrz7XpnsFmakny1grE8AGkH2vjjNo sxBt+25aTlDl/7YzJNnsH8TYsSE+/tNbeuLmBaE0T84XJAbnMvRx08yYhBvgbfbR nj85Z/kaRBqcDJew16Y8Hu4/sRAahmeOXtEhr6cWP3SuuBG7VZLoM/9FiWeuRprx f+7npHjSmrxob/WA0vvHVKiPQSlPmv5IV3hBZNrOm2BOqMldnkXk5TMIog/MBlSF hSX97ZjPCHbPKo7UvEryrTPy07V2fLSgyqg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudefvddgfeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhephfffheeljeffgeffueeghfekkedtfffgheejvdegjeettdduheeufffggfef jeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 06:51:15 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.57, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309319 Archived-At: On 27/08/2023 09:26, João Távora wrote: > In my personal case I find no significant difference in working with > either model.  I find certain GitHub discussions and issue threads > just as pleasant or toxic as the things I find here.  I find email > reviews of patches no more complicated than those sophisticated > boxes.  Trivial patches to typos and stuff are indeed a little > harder to apply here compared with the the big green button.  But > then trivial patches aren't the things moving a project > forward anyway. Have you noticed any difference in the amount of bug reports here vs Github? Any difference in the volume of user participation: further comments, follow-ups, etc?