From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master d826037 3/3: Remove the need for temacs.in Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 20:43:00 -0700 Message-ID: <6bbfa27e-390d-6680-7fe5-d7b97f29318a@dancol.org> References: <20190409224339.20116.87667@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190409224342.0DA1F20E54@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <86697de6baf024290a9d0b10743ba2b7.squirrel@dancol.org> <9093e1cb-7cad-14df-9428-6229313e8f51@cs.ucla.edu> <7bd7a4577abcebd089c7aecc253718f2.squirrel@dancol.org> <0c98c320ec76444fb5af1971d8f99360.squirrel@dancol.org> <064a6c19-760d-a2b6-8f9c-8f7972557b65@cs.ucla.edu> <597d5c5a-f8c1-3b69-006d-6e3da4b1124d@cs.ucla.edu> <838swel7lt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="206293"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 14 05:43:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hFW3c-000rSs-2q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 05:43:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFW3b-00088c-2C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFW2x-00088V-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFW2w-0000r2-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:50630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFW2v-0000qM-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:43:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=2rq9yDTj3R0capXt6kKZhk/hLFe120DZWN2xSUengSU=; b=cMFao4PRZDPEgfuBiP9p9XdrlSrVXkIyO09kzUqXcItgV1FR+3JQDLW39hbTJv6Q2tw8bT3UojkcclhtNhDmXxTW6rL3b+DvV7PTk+i1AFyujlOQ8x0np7r2A8nsRhoOmc7cAjDD0Nu3Qvk6xDIDuYiGF+hqJ3hXNPADnj+gAESQwi6SNW/eEBjS9W+PEXIDlRcA+0tIftZVVTcbYOrFZx0KfjMZBuriTHxNu167irjROMhv4P1gweipTrnD9fODGVZ+EgBlOnLbiA9crJEBntOaza4Ii1EZ8NV1ilvRLjSDSyUQ+4M9a5xTx+N89D0gqLH/AnVd+hnox8Mne66JPA==; Original-Received: from [2604:4080:1321:9a00:fc2a:787c:f84c:2105] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hFW2u-00028T-5B; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 20:43:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235423 Archived-At: On 4/13/19 8:40 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Paul, I think this discussion pointed out that there are no advantages >> to your change, while it does have disadvantages. > > Hmm... it does have the advantage of speeding up compilation by > eliminating one `ld` call (and one that's on the critical path and > doesn't benefit from multiple cores). I find this non-negligible. Implementing the rewrite-in-place idea would make us both happy, wouldn't it?