From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12535: 24.2.50; [PATCH] `edmacro-parse-keys' is incorrect for M- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6b5e4737-edb3-4f0c-b4e7-252330d3436e@default> References: <584510D2C7DE47CBAE19B5058B21B51C@us.oracle.com> <87eh3ba7s9.fsf@building.gnus.org> <877fhuej87.fsf@gnus.org> <87bn4t7ih6.fsf@gnus.org> <2493efa4-e079-446c-8926-f7ee14c04ec9@default> <87eg9oa7kp.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="104430"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 12535@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 27 18:44:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXVj-000Qz0-AT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:44:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52666 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXVi-0005tW-BC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXAt-0002F6-Nh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXAs-0008P5-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXAs-0008OM-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXAr-00085r-P1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:23:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12535 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 12535-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12535.156165252931034 (code B ref 12535); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12535) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2019 16:22:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39379 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXA1-00084U-9l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:50828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgX9y-00083q-Fv for 12535@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:22:07 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5RGJfwe122396; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:21:58 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=0txM+hd66j/TNUNTC4PbA4alXtrFavqWoean3LXJo4Y=; b=IX3vrjjwkxWQd9KpJlLT9QkrINNY9A5hAMynePwh2ccXEXqw0rHaxUUQBUg4BWd8IVfP J1UHWuRQ0smT23EuUgi4r8y9m8Rh/QOTowYu066nurkckjPeizDFS1RGtBWaDWCpjTlo bBSx3ZmNu239HVnSS3IGGrxh2zeV/8IPHzMXPYrEO+LetWC0qnwtk+4v5vBh0AIXWs4G pIcuwkGH/T73/YZRC73HskCHnAW+5+lBuPUALPNLUirHMksTiFkiPYqKj3M7LyX/x/ZT EJTflXTu6vgvSFdhIhjUhtkDqP10u6wjaLXKJcfAOtJGOwpLgQH6xBeJfDSiPGriQ9Cb 6Q== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t9brthcc2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:21:58 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5RGLwwu190740; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:21:58 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t99f54338-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:21:58 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x5RGLqvv015939; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:21:52 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4861.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9301 signatures=668688 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906270187 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9301 signatures=668688 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906270187 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161613 Archived-At: > >> See my previous comment. If you don't want to make the > >> one-line change required to fix this bug, too bad. > > > > If you can't be bothered to test the code you're submitting, that's als= o > > too bad. >=20 > And that didn't happen in the three years since, so I'm closing this bug > report. Truly ridiculous. A _great_ example (unfortunately). Ten msgs back & forth. Trivial change of this line: =09=09=09 "\\<\\(NUL\\|RET\\|LFD\\|ESC\\|SPC\\|DEL\\)$" to this one (just add "\\|TAB"): =09=09=09 "\\<\\(NUL\\|RET\\|LFD\\|ESC\\|SPC\\|DEL\\|TAB\\)$" ^^^^^^ So much for users reporting bugs. Just the bug report, regardless of whether any freebie suggested solution code was also provided (which it was), should have sufficed to get this fixed 7 years ago. With also a description of the solution (just add an entry for TAB) - again regardless of whether suggested code to do that was also provided - it's inconceivable that nothing was done about this (and in fact there was pedantic pushback). Lamentable. Users _help_ by reporting bugs. End of story. It's not important to this reporter _how_ the bug gets fixed. If you find something deficient about the fix that was volunteered, another fix is fine. The point is that there's a bug. (And any fix should be trivial, here.) Do you think there's no bug? Or is it "wontfix" because it's too difficult to fix? Or because you don't think it should be fixed? Or because you don't like the suggested fix, and you don't want to look for a better one? Or is it just because you want to fight or play a game of some kind? I really cannot imagine why that 6-char fix would not have been applied sometime in the 7 years that have elapsed since the report - let alone why the bug would now be closed as "wontfix". Of course, if there's a good argument as to why there's no bug, that's different. None has been presented. The bug report was just handled like a complaint form filled out improperly: fill-out-the-form-again-and-go-to-the-end-of-the-line-and-start-over.