From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Daniel Colascione" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Per-window face support Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:03:27 -0700 Message-ID: <6b522145569975d52266e29e8122e86b.squirrel@dancol.org> References: <5e08587a56ad528599ed5fb259be6335.squirrel@dancol.org> <83muw5vdtr.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhzvyqfy.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgbezs6q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529182895 28655 195.159.176.226 (16 Jun 2018 21:01:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 21:01:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 16 23:01:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUIK9-0007HI-S2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:01:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52862 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUIMF-0003wY-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 17:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57937) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUIM6-0003wI-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 17:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUIM5-0004ws-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 17:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:53388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUIM5-0004wf-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 17:03:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID; bh=qmxitgJpN4Ayl75i3mF0qGquHZJFzRCPXLEg5v+R8ZA=; b=oxf5uAVfcc7aX5MKnYVYC6RKm0lTt0VnGXWY1+PBD4fO7f678wZNSfPbD2GfOc3PbX21zikH9kNtsIdGXWdcR/cHvfzn24aSl7/CHLc1eJ727wMASmyn9z08o9jHw+tG45myp3u0p4wc8OEGIb7/fb9OUpwRtrOhAJ3tBqO+Q2/MF9S3QUWjrZ4QP4mtefbdYwoE9OadPVYMubqBFfIR8eOfgJgLoUNQdPCrkQdiC6bn+/s7Fa0izd0q/aWIK1mLnSFmW4mJ5MvohxO0qSr3khUX7B4sJiNK8hr77mKLcAVJOdGAqe+0y2q8kwQA27d0ZQG97T+Ep/ws8hqSsCr1AA==; Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dancol.org) by dancol.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUIM2-0003XQ-Tc; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:03:27 -0700 Original-Received: from 127.0.0.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dancol) by dancol.org with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:03:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226394 Archived-At: >>>> > I still wonder why we only allow EQ there, it sounds unnecessarily >>>> > restrictive. > > Agree. A recent discussion indeed pointed out that EQ is fundamentally > flawed and there can be good reasons to try and give up on EQ and use > `equal` instead. Huh? EQ is the simplest, least flawed primitive one can imagine. It's simple object identity comparison.