On the other hand: Shouldn't a simple `make' do everything needed to succeed?
git pull && make clean && make && make doc && make install
git pull & && make && make installI dropped make doc because it seems that there is som problem with texinfo files of these new version.
In principle I would agree, and if you download a zip or tar distribution,
On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de> writes:
Trying to `make' org-mode fails with the following error message:
In toplevel form:
lisp/org-ascii.el:29:1:Error: Symbol's function definition is void:
org-float-time
make: *** [lisp/org-ascii.elc] Fehler 1
Opening the org-mode/lisp/ directory in dired and marking all *.el files
(`% m el$ RET) and byte-compiling them (`B') works for
org-ascii.el.
There it just failes for org-xoxo.el for the same reason.
sh$ make clean
sh$ make
does the trick...
Or even (if not clean):
sh$ make autoloads
sh$ make
I think we can live with it, as this is not unusual at all.
On the other hand: Shouldn't a simple `make' do everything needed to succeed?
it works just like that. However, in the git distro, you do
create new files which stick around when you update.
Of course we could add a "make clean" to the ALL target, but it seems to me
that this is different from other uses of make. Maybe the make update should contain it?
- Carsten
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode