From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50999: 29.0.50; Deleting libraries obsolete since Emacs 24 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 14:28:04 +1300 Message-ID: <6ab9bfbae4298079f1514812985bb224@webmail.orcon.net.nz> References: <87r1d1nn5m.fsf@gnus.org> <875yuc7y44.fsf@gnus.org> <83lf374px5.fsf@gnu.org> <2ec2e4374dba11a63ab17609f25f7cd8@webmail.orcon.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24127"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Orcon Webmail Cc: 50999@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 06 03:29:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvk6-000695-KV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 03:29:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51258 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvk4-0000QY-Na for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvjy-0000QM-H5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvjy-0004aa-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvjx-00076U-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Phil Sainty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 01:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50999 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50999-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50999.163348370327258 (code B ref 50999); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 01:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50999) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2021 01:28:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvjL-00075a-Jw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:53557) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvjK-00075S-7i for 50999@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 21:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=53437 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXvj2-0000JA-Qn; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 14:28:04 +1300 Original-Received: from ip-203-94-48-127.kinect.net.nz ([203.94.48.127]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 14:28:04 +1300 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: psainty@orcon.net.nz X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216511 Archived-At: On 2021-10-06 02:39, Stefan Kangas wrote: > longlines.el will not be removed here, as I said in the first message > in this thread. Oops. Apologies for missing that. > I have not formed an opinion on the rest of your email, but may > I propose that it might be better to open a new bug report for > un-obsoleting it? I'll do that now. -Phil