From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.tangents Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 21:04:31 +0200 Message-ID: <6a9d65eb-8d08-5fd8-a52e-9297ba508b43@yandex.ru> References: <6193374b-a60d-ba82-91b5-afdede18e3bb@yandex.ru> <72871d3a-3b6a-d6fd-01cc-4248f817923c@yandex.ru> <801f93f3-8c1f-5f5f-6351-e1169bc309ae@yandex.ru> <83k0sp27f6.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnwolu2i.fsf@gnu.org> <835z48lf21.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27098"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: emacs-tangents@gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support, ulm@gentoo.org, ams@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com, eliz@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 20:04:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyJXj-0006uA-Bs for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 20:04:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyJXi-0001Ss-BR for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 14:04:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyJXY-0001Sm-LE for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 14:04:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]:38469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyJXW-0003RA-Ry; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 14:04:44 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id g185so11253846wmf.3; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:04:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oupOnGOx6ijNEJD9J79MoQT87yTEqhjBD80LPJxjdgI=; b=B/edZRkIrBSSL1ZmnrEPDH1rrP4/ZMnmYhnxAcZGZoxWWmBu/+teWPW0Ps/p2v6bEr X7H77i4bmagc2d9KJbFGa7gv4QQuAZdf1DJ3gv56ERlygxkuYmsVyoesMND45dr78AGW jDW5Nn7B2zfzIHWWR/UGIOCqxBIUo35Kk6bSuQf9d9KrX1UA92DiVh0xhOIBIWVQ3AsT h+zfd2REPTN53g96vEeaH3f74aY3jAjZcyDEnsQj5XYMgmv0XHSEnE9uSvXqwliruDbG CxHiZbQWD/0kowUBl4u3V/AMoaAVEGgeEmIQRyFadP542SxKWyUUduANsR0BlL9zndHL gDIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oupOnGOx6ijNEJD9J79MoQT87yTEqhjBD80LPJxjdgI=; b=nRsZ+i/NA/AlYxcCXHQ8NlmnFQWDGAmCztNaUkH7ADWB6j4fcUcMTeDR69rFPXtO1S V6fLbb6ggiaJYxolUnPfwgQsHLx9Pevl/v1y2pqxteP58ApYWLOaryvEjuyGcFl+Y4v6 JBnXxgl9ZCKoU/slIIOIB59iAPwbZ70dwVXDXzFUmmsqbdK2cLE8zQHUqqaayE0o/b+X 3omfsy2GGOZEkGOm8Sik25EhCz9oFl2sTUh0WPIfHaXAsJHDk+7x1ejPoffsV4lEOfmh KFwVTR6n/dGqQfZaCd7FumkNgDBiGoZRs+WO7vvU4JC8/JFVS74rC5hpdiaj+kcbI27p RoGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tkvS28n30Ckh56iEBGj3AGBFgApw3Tfx42ifJAoqW2YM4Wlw/ LVLHrpdHuphWRsl4RcEPZliVITO1dHntPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz603h6XMMTaiuTjUSc0zzA/9xaC6HcxSYG4U6WCKfW/uSlwycqlLycguQ0rTk4TAjfF6Qhww== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6205:: with SMTP id w5mr8303128wmb.26.1610219079890; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:04:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p8sm18459331wru.50.2021.01.09.11.04.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:04:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32b; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.255, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-tangents@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-tangents" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.tangents:554 Archived-At: On 09.01.2021 08:34, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > > If the goal of the GNU project is to eliminate non-free software, why > > > Eliminate it by ignoring it, I take it. > > You have misrepresented one of the secondary things we do > while denying all the rest. The only point that expresses > is your hostility, and that harms our discussion here. This is humor. Sarcasm may be the lowest form, but there's little left that I can use to underline the imbalance in your collective position. And consider that this is exactly how it looks to a lot of people in our community. Which would be a valuable piece of info if you care about the said community and GNU's perception in it. I suppose Eli conveyed the same point better in a more recent email, though, in a language that could be closer to your line of thinking. > Please pay attention to the Kind Communications Guidelines, > so you can express your recommendations in ways that contribute > to our work rather than hampering it. Have you considered that condemning fellow FLOSS projects as "promoting proprietary software" is unkind? One could even call it libel. I get it that it might be hard for you to reverse what seems to be a decades-long policy, but you could at least ask Alfred and Jean to tone the rhetoric down a bit. To keep our discussions more constructive.