From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:15:11 +0000 Message-ID: <6a5bb5a08b93601c5708@heytings.org> References: <837darmygd.fsf@gnu.org> <58bb8030d59733b52b8d@heytings.org> <83r18zkmd5.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq9ls7j.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11240176288f@heytings.org> <83h79tjd2f.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11f58780b580@heytings.org> <83v8y8ij39.fsf@gnu.org> <6a5bb5a08b3d764611f9@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13891"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 25 22:17:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCTBf-0003Mq-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:17:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCTBe-0004qB-DG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:17:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCT9q-0003w9-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:41636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCT9m-0003S9-TK; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:15:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1643145312; bh=zVcO018Wbtc809Jv4iKIzIpIh6Ot6JS7lZiRRLo38oU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=BFuq3Em6kzEZpO6vhfk0fkeiyyfNzJhPMgV5OgjpDw5rBUYXshi+KglXY0yusggAj j40Am0OywAtc0/xCP1bdQTF5X5bEmcgzLUK6Of0XMsWts2srrBVpxpGsgcp1Mwns5m HafsPZYTHdHBLtX/RIftMX+tagOQfO0rllB2pr/IoD/OvnmhhFw1XXC12NnlmLmEBZ Ckdxm4NyE1OLuWXBiJXPv6b9GyspuUnBAq7nnYuw7mg+KV/8//MGE97tc8g2kw02zo UuBte5CeCdUjU4GCxgoH/N2qmpcMknudXxdiY0uFiVGxUlsYlkkaNeKx5FfBhvUnok LtmPKOYOgaS4w== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285394 Archived-At: >> Are there other benchmarks (not micro-benchmarks) that could be used to >> reach what you would consider a mature conclusion? > > There is Andrea Corallo's elisp-benchmark package. > It's a micro-benchmark, and moreover it is difficult to interpret, its results on the same (unloaded) machine with the same version of Emacs vary by +/- 5%.