all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p
@ 2024-11-30  0:38 Yuan Fu
  2024-11-30  7:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Fu @ 2024-11-30  0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 74612

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 164 bytes --]

Eli, are you ok with this patch on emacs-30? Almost all tree-sitter node functions allows user to pass nil for NODE, so treesit-node-match-p should too.

Yuan


[-- Attachment #2: treesit-node-match-p.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1301 bytes --]

From 9ab20d03e30e46e2b8502877de68eec0b511d3da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:33:28 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p

* src/treesit.c (Ftreesit_node_match_p): Return nil if NODE is nil.
---
 src/treesit.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/treesit.c b/src/treesit.c
index 4031d80f7c9..cda6d4af2ee 100644
--- a/src/treesit.c
+++ b/src/treesit.c
@@ -4017,7 +4017,8 @@ DEFUN ("treesit-node-match-p",
 `treesit-thing-settings', or a predicate, like regexp matching node
 type, etc.  See `treesit-thing-settings' for more details.
 
-Return non-nil if NODE matches PREDICATE, nil otherwise.
+Return non-nil if NODE matches PREDICATE, nil otherwise.  If NODE is
+nil, return nil.
 
 Signals `treesit-invalid-predicate' if there's no definition of THING
 in `treesit-thing-settings', or if PREDICATE is malformed.  If
@@ -4025,6 +4026,8 @@ DEFUN ("treesit-node-match-p",
 definition, but still signal for malformed PREDICATE.  */)
   (Lisp_Object node, Lisp_Object predicate, Lisp_Object ignore_missing)
 {
+  if (NILP (node)) return Qnil;
+
   CHECK_TS_NODE (node);
 
   Lisp_Object parser = XTS_NODE (node)->parser;
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-151)


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p
  2024-11-30  0:38 bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p Yuan Fu
@ 2024-11-30  7:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2024-12-01  8:31   ` Yuan Fu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-11-30  7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yuan Fu; +Cc: 74612

> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:38:22 -0800
> 
> Eli, are you ok with this patch on emacs-30? Almost all tree-sitter node functions allows user to pass nil for NODE, so treesit-node-match-p should too.

Does this solve an actual problem you've seen somewhere (and if so,
which problem), or does it solve a potential problem that didn't
actually happen yet?

Also, does CHECK_TS_NODE allow nil or does it currently signal an
error?





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p
  2024-11-30  7:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-12-01  8:31   ` Yuan Fu
  2024-12-01  9:59     ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Fu @ 2024-12-01  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 74612



> On Nov 29, 2024, at 11:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:38:22 -0800
>> 
>> Eli, are you ok with this patch on emacs-30? Almost all tree-sitter node functions allows user to pass nil for NODE, so treesit-node-match-p should too.
> 
> Does this solve an actual problem you've seen somewhere (and if so,
> which problem), or does it solve a potential problem that didn't
> actually happen yet?

I encountered this problem (more like an inconvenience, since without this feature I’d need to test for nullness before passing a node to treesit-node-match-p) when using treesit-node-match-p for some new code I’m writing for master branch. Since (treesit-node-match-p node “type name”) is easier to write and shorter than (equal (treesit-node-type node) “type name”) or (string-match-p “type name regex” (treesit-node-type node)), I’ve been using it liberally in new code :)

> 
> Also, does CHECK_TS_NODE allow nil or does it currently signal an
> error?

CHECK_TS_NODE currently signals an error. All the tree-sitter node functions that accepts nil has the "if (NILP (node)) return Qnil” line before CHECK_TS_NODE (or treesit_check_node)

If you’re not too comfortable with the change, we can apply it to master. It wouldn’t create any backward-incompatibility since this change makes treesit-node-match-p more lenient on its argument, not stricter. The drawback is treesit-node-match-p will be a bit more annoying to use.

Yuan






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p
  2024-12-01  8:31   ` Yuan Fu
@ 2024-12-01  9:59     ` Eli Zaretskii
  2024-12-05  9:43       ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-12-01  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yuan Fu; +Cc: 74612

> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 00:31:05 -0800
> Cc: 74612@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> 
> 
> > On Nov 29, 2024, at 11:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:38:22 -0800
> >> 
> >> Eli, are you ok with this patch on emacs-30? Almost all tree-sitter node functions allows user to pass nil for NODE, so treesit-node-match-p should too.
> > 
> > Does this solve an actual problem you've seen somewhere (and if so,
> > which problem), or does it solve a potential problem that didn't
> > actually happen yet?
> 
> I encountered this problem (more like an inconvenience, since without this feature I’d need to test for nullness before passing a node to treesit-node-match-p) when using treesit-node-match-p for some new code I’m writing for master branch. Since (treesit-node-match-p node “type name”) is easier to write and shorter than (equal (treesit-node-type node) “type name”) or (string-match-p “type name regex” (treesit-node-type node)), I’ve been using it liberally in new code :)
> 
> > 
> > Also, does CHECK_TS_NODE allow nil or does it currently signal an
> > error?
> 
> CHECK_TS_NODE currently signals an error. All the tree-sitter node functions that accepts nil has the "if (NILP (node)) return Qnil” line before CHECK_TS_NODE (or treesit_check_node)
> 
> If you’re not too comfortable with the change, we can apply it to master. It wouldn’t create any backward-incompatibility since this change makes treesit-node-match-p more lenient on its argument, not stricter. The drawback is treesit-node-match-p will be a bit more annoying to use.

OK, please install on emacs-30, and thanks.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p
  2024-12-01  9:59     ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-12-05  9:43       ` Eli Zaretskii
  2024-12-06  7:24         ` Yuan Fu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-12-05  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: casouri; +Cc: 74612-done

> Cc: 74612@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 11:59:58 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> > From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 00:31:05 -0800
> > Cc: 74612@debbugs.gnu.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > On Nov 29, 2024, at 11:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> > >> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:38:22 -0800
> > >> 
> > >> Eli, are you ok with this patch on emacs-30? Almost all tree-sitter node functions allows user to pass nil for NODE, so treesit-node-match-p should too.
> > > 
> > > Does this solve an actual problem you've seen somewhere (and if so,
> > > which problem), or does it solve a potential problem that didn't
> > > actually happen yet?
> > 
> > I encountered this problem (more like an inconvenience, since without this feature I’d need to test for nullness before passing a node to treesit-node-match-p) when using treesit-node-match-p for some new code I’m writing for master branch. Since (treesit-node-match-p node “type name”) is easier to write and shorter than (equal (treesit-node-type node) “type name”) or (string-match-p “type name regex” (treesit-node-type node)), I’ve been using it liberally in new code :)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also, does CHECK_TS_NODE allow nil or does it currently signal an
> > > error?
> > 
> > CHECK_TS_NODE currently signals an error. All the tree-sitter node functions that accepts nil has the "if (NILP (node)) return Qnil” line before CHECK_TS_NODE (or treesit_check_node)
> > 
> > If you’re not too comfortable with the change, we can apply it to master. It wouldn’t create any backward-incompatibility since this change makes treesit-node-match-p more lenient on its argument, not stricter. The drawback is treesit-node-match-p will be a bit more annoying to use.
> 
> OK, please install on emacs-30, and thanks.

I see you did, so I'm closing this bug.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p
  2024-12-05  9:43       ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-12-06  7:24         ` Yuan Fu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yuan Fu @ 2024-12-06  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 74612-done



> On Dec 5, 2024, at 1:43 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> Cc: 74612@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 11:59:58 +0200
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> 
>>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 00:31:05 -0800
>>> Cc: 74612@debbugs.gnu.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 29, 2024, at 11:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:38:22 -0800
>>>>> 
>>>>> Eli, are you ok with this patch on emacs-30? Almost all tree-sitter node functions allows user to pass nil for NODE, so treesit-node-match-p should too.
>>>> 
>>>> Does this solve an actual problem you've seen somewhere (and if so,
>>>> which problem), or does it solve a potential problem that didn't
>>>> actually happen yet?
>>> 
>>> I encountered this problem (more like an inconvenience, since without this feature I’d need to test for nullness before passing a node to treesit-node-match-p) when using treesit-node-match-p for some new code I’m writing for master branch. Since (treesit-node-match-p node “type name”) is easier to write and shorter than (equal (treesit-node-type node) “type name”) or (string-match-p “type name regex” (treesit-node-type node)), I’ve been using it liberally in new code :)
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Also, does CHECK_TS_NODE allow nil or does it currently signal an
>>>> error?
>>> 
>>> CHECK_TS_NODE currently signals an error. All the tree-sitter node functions that accepts nil has the "if (NILP (node)) return Qnil” line before CHECK_TS_NODE (or treesit_check_node)
>>> 
>>> If you’re not too comfortable with the change, we can apply it to master. It wouldn’t create any backward-incompatibility since this change makes treesit-node-match-p more lenient on its argument, not stricter. The drawback is treesit-node-match-p will be a bit more annoying to use.
>> 
>> OK, please install on emacs-30, and thanks.
> 
> I see you did, so I'm closing this bug.

Thank you Eli.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-06  7:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-30  0:38 bug#74612: 30.0.90; [PATCH] Allow passing nil to treesit-node-match-p Yuan Fu
2024-11-30  7:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-01  8:31   ` Yuan Fu
2024-12-01  9:59     ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-05  9:43       ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-06  7:24         ` Yuan Fu

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.