From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: chad Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make `C-x {' and `C-x }' repeatable Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 17:18:50 -0700 Message-ID: <6CA0C904-94F7-4ECF-A8E0-BC78844E5348@mit.edu> References: <87mwrombc3.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87r4gyondh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369268366 1727 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2013 00:19:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 00:19:26 +0000 (UTC) To: Drew Adams , "emacs-devel@gnu.org Development" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 23 02:19:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UfJFa-0002gz-QX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:19:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45339 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfJFa-0005l7-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 20:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47132) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfJFN-0005k0-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 20:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfJFB-0002ff-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 20:19:09 -0400 Original-Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu ([18.7.68.37]:53389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfJFA-0002fC-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 20:18:56 -0400 X-AuditID: 12074425-b7f986d00000082c-6d-519d606f1bc5 Original-Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id C3.8A.02092.F606D915; Wed, 22 May 2013 20:18:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r4N0IseS006526; Wed, 22 May 2013 20:18:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.0.106] ([12.198.236.170]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as yandros@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r4N0In9S026701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 May 2013 20:18:53 -0400 X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpkleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IR4hRV1s1PmBto8OaApsXlw69YLB4veMLq wOTRNs3M4+PTWywBTFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGQcXX2Yr2M9eseTTUpYGxka2LkZODgkBE4m+ I0fYIWwxiQv31oPFhQT2MUqsb8rtYuQCsjcySjz8uZkRIrGYSeL+xigQm1lAR2Ln1jtgDbwC ehLXvn0FGyQsYCFxbsdT1i5GDg42ARmgoRoQ83klZrQ/ZQGxOQWsJf7sucwMYrMIqEqsWryY GWKkvMT2t3OYIUZaSTy78YMZ4oajTBLblt1lBJkpIpAhcXinF8RMWYnXz9+wTGAUnIXkollI LpqFZOwCRuZVjLIpuVW6uYmZOcWpybrFyYl5ealFuhZ6uZkleqkppZsYQaHL7qK6g3HCIaVD jAIcjEo8vAduzAkUYk0sK67MPcQoycGkJMobFD83UIgvKT+lMiOxOCO+qDQntfgQowQHs5II 7ydXoBxvSmJlVWpRPkxKmoNFSZz3RspNfyGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpisBgeHwN0lvRsYpVjy8vNS lSR4V8YBDREsSk1PrUjLzClBKGXi4ARZxAO0aBPIEbzFBYm5xZnpEPlTjIpS4rxlIM0CIImM 0jy4XljKecUoDvSWMG8bSDsPMF3Bdb8CGswENHjpqTkgg0sSEVJSDYxhf1yKGhdPzvR6FfZt nVVAh+3x3SH8de8XtmcktC3e9yEurSJC+P+MZ7XTEy9Z/5cs3vCz8M20dxqGF/5P2XWDgYnZ dfkO2c2rz2ZvUT+dK3Dlwsmq7oxLX/g5/LOnP/Xb+MlUR2/OBxEbc0bLi8/WKYVz X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 18.7.68.37 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159739 Archived-At: On 22 May 2013, at 16:53, Drew Adams wrote: > There is also the question (assuming a fix that would apply the prefix > arg from the prefix key to each repeated final key) of whether using a > prefix arg before an individual final key should affect only that key > occurrence or all subsequent key hits as well. I haven't tried this yet, but I imagine that I would want subsequent commands to *ignore* the prefix. For example, I would grow a window by 4 or 16, then use single keystrokes to fit more accurately from there. I do something similar to this now with a simple macro (long-since built into my fingers) that grows a window by 12. Have you perhaps tried this behavior with window-sizing commands? Did it feel more natural to always adjust the window by a large increment, or did you find that you typically adjusted it by a small increment and repeated the growth multiple times? Thanks in advance. ~Chad