From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Adolf Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:13:50 +0200 Message-ID: <69ea57158ccbae3720d97aa2d51381a1@condition-alpha.com> References: <83v93srwsp.fsf@gnu.org> <0ce705ec-3ee1-61fa-c8b8-9864e6e2a65a@yandex.ru> <83pmu0rvp8.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfywc7y3.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12259"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , danflscr@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dick , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 02 13:27:08 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLks7-0002wC-Um for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:27:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLks6-00025J-PG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLkfN-00082d-Qe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.16]:45950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLkfJ-0000lM-CD; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [46.244.213.143] (helo=condition-alpha.com) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLkd2-0003DP-Sf; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:11:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Df-Sender: YWxleGFuZGVyLmFkb2xmQGNvbmRpdGlvbi1hbHBoYS5jb20= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.67.18.16; envelope-from=alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com; helo=smtprelay04.ispgateway.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273701 Archived-At: Alexander Adolf writes: > [...] > Finally, a remark on issue/bug tracking. I have used a great many > trackers, and debbugs and Bugzilla stand out from the crowd. By a huge > margin. The differentiating feature is blocks/depends-on. Many issue > trackers (including those in the various git hosting platforms) lack > this feature altogether. Those trackers who have it, often provide a > limited flavour, e.g. limiting it to one level (i.e. a bug that blocks > another bug, can itself not be blocked by other bugs), or make it > awkward to use (e.g. you have to create a new bug as a subtask of > an existing one, and existing bugs cannot be made into subtasks any more > once created). > > Hence my plea: debbugs ought to remain part of whatever any new system > might be. > [...] This discussion might be of interest in this context: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6qoqqi/gnome_wants_to_move_away_from_bugzilla_for_their/