From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: S Boucher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6967: flymake not cleaning after itself (kill-buffer) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <696071.46975.qm@web56805.mail.re3.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283370079 14843 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2010 19:41:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:41:19 +0000 (UTC) To: 6967@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 21:41:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqtBG-0003Ak-CV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:41:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45001 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqtBD-0005Di-82 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39875 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqtAN-0004hs-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqt9u-0008Ks-EP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqt9u-0008Ki-B1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqsos-0004C6-Bj; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: S Boucher Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6967 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128336864716112 (code B ref -1); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2010 19:17:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqsoJ-0004Bp-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:17:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqsoH-0004Bk-IM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:60729) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqspu-0006U6-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:19:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38274 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oqspt-0000Qa-1T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:19:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqspr-0005FB-L3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from web56805.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([66.196.97.79]:48472) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqspr-0005Ew-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 47228 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Sep 2010 19:19:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283368742; bh=/ZliCqEQxVAr4mFIn34rarnh/jXjhkxTQfWP5u0FUko=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sGIwN2zDc+9Cv8xGuiYhyRmiLGKFtjfil6U/LlkVcRmWIcR2JDOMWHKaKkQ9Xpp9mLWLI5ELUEoqKCJDJPlHVdV5qv5jRs5P0ntfSeeS8gWY+RnILJhDqYBGkiXMIT5y9s8CZLITrTZBndInrKrd1cBXAJqevST0yk0och6haeo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=c52+KLIFPO1IN5mIMN2cyH2Q/wVHXAeMy04kckWay4rPdPNiveNj05yklTZJPtuVZ88+lsJXdBRLv9Vkx5YazyklV95OagKu6I3MFkArp8MIQP6iaXIBUE/sSISEqCxYX/jV1qCx0CNrXcExXYL9kKVko9u6syivmAwcVYf9TD0=; X-YMail-OSG: djzJZUUVM1lJ52PfAx4CvgXRhblFh8N.llWai2prwWAYSxo f9OVoiDcMXqiLWe2GV15oFj9L5hlMCsAEfjx0WEp5RUms0vpiLpUIgC7T1lg KrepGhle6iMQz9yWZnmiJKlB.Jjb507ydEGs8Y6RocRjhoLIb4ap9WVrjS_J knAI.D6VcpBWNr.676ZtLx4OI.o4btG2_4sHcfGz5WUBG0e_D8_uGQUYXfvy iegve0jbJk3M4IqnKNotw084yU5zRIQlw9RUJm.3eBilsf2uZpWYJzwYmIoW qJuP4pI24mymzML2J6T8GGzoPdw-- Original-Received: from [209.5.112.166] by web56805.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:19:02 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:18:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39887 Archived-At: That's with emacs 23.2 flymake-kill-buffer-hook does not actually kill the flymake process. So, if flymake is used in conjunction with semantic, it gets problematic. When semantic does background parsing, it may find-file/kill-buffer for files not already in memory. If semantic proceeds to kill-buffer while a flymake process is running, then a window pops up asking whether the buffer's process should be killed (because kill-buffer asks before killing processes). It seems like flymake-kill-buffer-hook should kill the buffer, so that by the time semantic calls kill-buffer, there won't be a process to query about.