From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dhruva Krishnamurthy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Successful build of emacs-unicode-2 under Windows with MinGW Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:07:30 +0530 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <68c73b1a0409202237489fef97@mail.gmail.com> References: <876568ontp.fsf@darkhell.com> Reply-To: Dhruva Krishnamurthy NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095745105 19779 80.91.229.6 (21 Sep 2004 05:38:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 21 07:38:12 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C9dLw-0003IH-00 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:38:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9dRq-00086w-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:44:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C9dRj-00086g-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C9dRi-00086G-3u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9dRi-00086D-0J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.170.207] (helo=mproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C9dLH-0004XR-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so2929043rnl for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.38.71.30 with SMTP id t30mr1133316rna; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.38.102.30 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Cheng Gao In-Reply-To: <876568ontp.fsf@darkhell.com> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27358 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27358 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:24:50 +0800, Cheng Gao wrote: > > And I have built it successfully under GNU/Linux (under Gentoo with > emacs-cvs-22.0.0.ebuild unmasked). You can see this post is made by > Emacs 22.0.0. > How important is it to test the emacs-unicode-2 branch at this juncture? I am willing to use it on a regular basis (though I do not use unicode features frequently) _if_ (by the main developers involved) it is found necessary. -dhruva -- Proud FSF member: #1935 http://schemer.fateback.com/