From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chetan Pandya Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:37:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <681309.45588.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: Reply-To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231198652 11895 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 23:37:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 06 00:38:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJz1t-0007jH-70 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:38:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45905 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJz0d-0000OO-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:37:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJz0L-0000DU-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:37:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJz0K-0000Cl-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:37:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39663 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJz0J-0000Cg-Oa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([216.252.101.46]:34226) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJz0J-0007kO-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 46531 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2009 23:37:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=DOpJfux9pCvdYQ/MB+xmAFsLNI2YVxjT3r083arPh+NY740DvFX2q5K1qe8ydnvWYjJdkGMp66sxd/EzxEOMl134sv6CmpkK743fx31xQKDzjP8jAfj3qBcmf5Xme5B9Xydi8QE7u1cppcO+cfHHwfGV6nio1j31WEJ+AYBNphE=; X-YMail-OSG: Z7MQ.yQVM1lpiirT6TwNF240Ma039Py44YNXdKBgmfPOQ_Lt85i0KOW8G6WEGv7aauilaUlX9iSuozmcnC6ieXFsMOqXh.f0dHNj5ayfzc91VVnsslboUtLuSYXcCU9ceE1Woq3k.fGdJMYqN6VfcvskGJp8egG8VjChI3PixgLZx5Vi01209BRFV6AaZC1ZqMoGzUGTaLt9wux.VZg- Original-Received: from [76.202.61.169] by web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:37:01 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107619 Archived-At: Since this discussion still seems to be ongoing, do I take it to mean that there is some flexibility on this issue? So far the discussion seems to be focussed on performance issues and the convenience as per individual preferences. It looks like even if there may be slowness for the initial setup, it is not an ongoing issue, so that does not look like a good deciding factor. Other than that, there are issues of work-flow model and stability, bugs and I do not see much discussion in that regard. having used for a very short time I don't think I can add anything there. I liked to hearing people with their own experiences. Using a tool may be one way of resolving issues with the it rather than that being the deciding factor. Any idea where things stand? Chetan --- On Mon, 1/5/09, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > I don't think comparison to CVS or Subversion update is relevant, > > In the context of whether or not to switch from CVS to Bzr, it is the > only relevant comparison. > > > Stefan