From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68663: Unsaved buffers dialog is unhelpful Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 01:41:12 +0200 Message-ID: <66532307-d494-43f7-832d-53808e85c06a@gutov.dev> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12649"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Nikolay Kudryavtsev , 68663@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 00:42:15 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rS3vi-00036m-Ed for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:42:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rS3vV-0002m7-Tz; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rS3vS-0002lg-GU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rS3vS-000571-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rS3vW-0003fV-6B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68663 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68663-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68663.170596688714058 (code B ref 68663); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68663) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2024 23:41:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rS3ux-0003eg-49 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:27 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:57019) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rS3uu-0003eP-Bv for 68663@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:25 -0500 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06845C0125; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1705966874; x=1706053274; bh=VRugN3xuwNxvE0GKKHnvtIjtc7DUW6Cm3ZNLy8DLL54=; b= odPqTFmXrf9G3b8p/+ywD5lV5YJYls0csoGU4LI0N7uxeiLGtWu7u3SnPM2eKH8c hGvPmsXtdAA/1JGnVsaIK7I68yLwKR/P5EuS7/g1JYtr6dle/cNoqAfuDMcrfuCk 8edvhJIOEZvl4wlKdv0TpYKwUffLIZ06DgkyGZe2cqe+XGWdEJC4cj8c26lSKlbu FSa6sLLCziDwFgGZLJG/qcA9gFC1SR/3AhUoKbfcGhi0ImYq/kwplg54dK86jUYr bTRbyVSBx6Zc2ELcf966iXBftaGfAp8v+ClPVS1/tSV6EZ0uPt6n0sqOKq9po88/ WjmhznFgybpqJJ6kgwM02w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1705966874; x= 1706053274; bh=VRugN3xuwNxvE0GKKHnvtIjtc7DUW6Cm3ZNLy8DLL54=; b=a +khM4q7Yv8tZev/Ekl77wgpMp/KnwXh4OMwgLyeVxY3ugIfJFOcGgLWsr69XkaI/ vpFiYssTS11Th1JFe+CqtMWGrf4grKPw7F6RLh10oD66U+MgVbuLNezbjhSaFkiX hOKh5zwUl5aeBLXMUCyAU5q4d1TooffkVyLFuYwMI+vpgz2zuYNWVuOrPfZ1CHtv uYsaVjjgTMLHkgP/v09y15U2+K+vaS1v9KQvHAHRlc0yxI9N8Y2Jh/jZmtgT8YcW JE9ZZ50p+qxpIl9npjXn7QannYpbn0JPHBGTJl5/86dwDsf4p5H/o7f2j/h/QHm7 j6xXOUmoAaWiK6FYY3jCA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdekjedguddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthejredttddvjeenucfhrhhomhepffhmihht rhihucfiuhhtohhvuceoughmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedthfeuvddtveelgeeuleevvdejveehffevveehvdeuffdtfefhvdeugefgtefg tdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegumh hithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:41:13 -0500 (EST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278718 Archived-At: On 22/01/2024 22:37, Nikolay Kudryavtsev wrote: > While restoring the old dialog would certainly be an improvement over > the current situation, maybe some options should be trimmed from it to > avoid overwhelming the user with too many options and maybe the whole > thing should be ported to a minibuffer prompt(made into a front-end over > save-some-buffers). It's 2024 and we no longer have to pretend that the > 90s GUI conventions are the future. Maybe it could allow presenting a combined diff, rather than showing the diffs for the buffers one by one.