From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adrian Aichner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:36:49 +0200 Organization: The XEmacs Project Message-ID: <64ksf7a6.fsf@smtprelay.t-online.de> References: <87r73ljvfa.fsf@myusenet.dyndns.org> <444F19B7.9080906@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146367032 5944 80.91.229.2 (30 Apr 2006 03:17:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Adrian Aichner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 30 05:17:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fa2Qe-0002t2-U0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:17:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fa2Qd-0003iN-US for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:16:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZwAv-0006pl-DF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:36:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZwAu-0006pG-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:36:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZwAt-0006p8-Q6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.25.134.19] (helo=mailout06.sul.t-online.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZwEI-0003bj-Vt; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fwd33.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1FZwAn-00005x-05; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:36:13 +0200 Original-Received: from TANG.t-online.de (S938k4ZHweqBxARv474k8zJ0AWuWqSWOe-ImR-p5wbFFe0OOaz4bgP@[84.153.75.80]) by fwd33.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1FZwAk-12nlaK0; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:36:10 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Attribution: APA X-Face: 4[iHdXiTu\V3u[~\I)*}#kYF[-tYl3VZga/HSOP|K,{L Rtu@f0y/=O&Cu}\:~d|P$JON?pn?j,&CnPb1z#/TL9bkAJwyol&a:SvYj-VYbM=Dtxhk9 =w|R6U3_;SH&B (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:09:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.5-b26 (windows-nt) X-ID: S938k4ZHweqBxARv474k8zJ0AWuWqSWOe-ImR-p5wbFFe0OOaz4bgP@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 34950cee-a181-491f-b749-248f83594429 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:16:49 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53638 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > Wouldn't be easier just to define reb-match-[4-9]? Faces aren't > > exactly a scarce resource, and nine is the maximum re-builder is going > > to use anyway. > > Why does it use no more than 9? Is that a natural limit > or an arbitrary limit? I think it's an arbitrary limitation, aside from the fact that reb-subexp-mode uses single digit key mappings to highlight individual sub-expressions. -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian@xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/