From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adrian Robert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest next week Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:39:42 +0200 Message-ID: <64D7164D-024E-4720-908C-94684A768A6E@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233855680 5208 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2009 17:41:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 18:42:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LV8F4-0001b8-F9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:42:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV8Dl-0004N0-Hn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV8CN-0003qK-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:39:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV8CK-0003q6-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:39:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32905 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV8CJ-0003q3-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:34877) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LV8CJ-0006Vo-8b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so86025nfi.26 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:39:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding :from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=o9798nvPk+Q4BHFk4g/gdv1l+jUQ3Id+wcQ9NYHdUfs=; b=m6+LTov2xL0ewGnPWsVcxA+EeKu/HMXyPVLquxdSHxmeHDwRceoiw+YekylOAhECSZ BxgFYbOJQJySCi37PxrGOwtQhAciYjq/V//KkLw8aA06Vhhm1HR2g9u0MEw2Ko5b2Tpa sHeE6jCJSVNjLq5Bz7zA/DEmBiTx90wYoR8ng= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=MssPyxQs4QHgrgw1QUjxR+IV9yxcZrjvmnFtswCCP6bzPMiX/KhDqTMNpKknoyME9I eN08XReE8pBt1vB3BvMe4IBK8Sj9hN5SCZKPdt9q5WMkOq34cINHL+vgRL1wJOlWHRPa tx5/jhdKLCeS6CBwpyIlMQSaT7aW6dApr4GWc= Original-Received: by 10.103.178.17 with SMTP id f17mr314499mup.45.1233855569713; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:39:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?10.20.47.190? (gw1.panoulu.net [212.50.147.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i7sm1018395mue.14.2009.02.05.09.39.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:39:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108798 Archived-At: On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:43 PM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:40:10 -0500, Richard M Stallman >>>>>> said: > >>> I thought it's shameful for Emacs to include a port that doesn't >>> handle C-g properly as a part of its official release. Also, I was >>> not suggesting the removal of the port from the whole CVS branches. > >> I believe it is working 100% now. Please report any specific >> failure cases >> you find through report-emacs-bug > >> Thank you. > > That's actually a way I didn't adopt because it confuses the user: it > shows empty menu items if the user clicks the menu bar at the timing > of a read_socket_hook call from a QUIT macro in the context of process > filters or idle timers. In the current implementation it does this only if menus have not been clicked on before (else the previous items, albeit out-of-date ones) are shown. This is better than nothing, though it should be better. However I'm not really sure how often this "clicks the menu bar at the timing of a read_socket_hook call from a QUIT macro" occurs in practice. Anyway, what about the second-thread approach like W32, are there any gotchas you know about?