From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: select yank via completion Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:40:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <645f1cc0-6e34-430c-9b98-627c9eaf13ba@default> References: <87wnymda5g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ima5he8j.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtzfzt9a.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k0uifp3w.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d009iykt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3341c426-3a86-4ef0-a0ca-9102191a925b@default> <87o8jsiems.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pn46sfd4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <0ff3cdb6-e735-4eaa-86d9-7ab980b74431@default> <87a6v5edqp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36006"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, Jean Louis , andreyk.mad@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, Stefan Monnier , Gregory Heytings , Eli Zaretskii To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 25 20:42:56 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0gp-0009Hg-Sl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:42:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0go-0001RU-SA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:42:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0fG-0000cS-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:57812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0fE-0000aL-RP; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0APJYZ5e046919; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:41:05 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=eIXNq3Bl1zPwGFhpCPmxF/Zs6BuFiEvsL0afWCUzjiw=; b=ZB+LLuwlJzqmbokBhUJgIpq4aM2zYLHxWWKFV0DOvwUNfJrDZ2GX2avm+s8icY3MErFY 45le8af+fiRKjM+f87kTHCBumSvyM5uV+7CJO05xhPQPXtmsST5Xk9ScmjzvyYLFA5r7 uCcX2jJ8ObkB+YOz8b66QcxY1wj1cxTdu31HqcWpin6EK0FA/85UiRKuBNi9owEm3juQ VlASFQ/WiN4iIIxgBvDEXZBMNfMQ6oLdttPltMoia6MftyBQJUa5vU2QvgznMU1pXO67 pkliXoj27X0Mwlsr7ZhiAD1udUpv3SRR/OeF0twavdUozOaN91tWPWsOIeoSbZ6Zs/0q 2g== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 351kwhb4j4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:41:05 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0APJa4u7143169; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:41:05 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 351n2jchhe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:41:05 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0007.oracle.com (abhmp0007.oracle.com [141.146.116.13]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0APJf05D021070; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:41:02 GMT In-Reply-To: <87a6v5edqp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5071.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9816 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=404 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011250122 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9816 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=417 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011250122 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=141.146.126.78; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=aserp2120.oracle.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259803 Archived-At: > >> The problem is that there is another self-inserting key that can be > >> used for text editing: '?' is bound to minibuffer-completion-help. > >> Maybe then the variable could be named e.g. minibuffer-self-insert? > > > > `?', like `SPC', should be self-inserting during > > completion. There's zero problem doing that. > > I've been doing it for years. > > > > I use `M-?', not `?', for completion help In my > > case it's `icicle-minibuffer-help', but vanilla > > Emacs could just bind `minibuffer-completion-help' > > to `M-?'. >=20 > completion-in-region already uses `M-?', so maybe > completion-in-minibuffer could use the same `M-?'? Maybe. I don't know what `completion-in-region' or `completion-in-minibuffer' is.