From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19990: 24.4; Bad resizing interaction when WM ignores size hints Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:18:42 +0100 Message-ID: <63285E43-E087-4DFE-8CE4-F5BE40951BB1@swipnet.se> References: <54F59D19.5000808@eurac.edu> <54F5F3C9.9070008@gmx.at> <54F6003E.7040900@eurac.edu> <54F752C8.7050009@gmx.at> <54F754A4.5050507@eurac.edu> <8D5FE96A-F0AE-4908-8AEF-DFDBAB504983@swipnet.se> <54F75D71.1080402@eurac.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425506394 9394 80.91.229.3 (4 Mar 2015 21:59:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19990@debbugs.gnu.org To: Yuri D'Elia Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 04 22:59:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTHKS-0007Hi-Ep for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:59:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTHKR-0006fh-C9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:59:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTHHk-0002Gx-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:56:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTHHf-0008Re-7Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTHHf-0008Ra-4y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:56:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTGh3-00079T-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:19:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19990-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19990.142550393127473 (code B ref 19990); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2015 21:18:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTGgs-000793-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:18:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailfe03.swip.net ([212.247.154.65]:55001 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTGgp-00078o-TJ for 19990@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:18:49 -0500 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe03.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 411186695; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:18:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54F75D71.1080402@eurac.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100076 Archived-At: > 4 mar 2015 kl. 20:30 skrev Yuri D'Elia : >=20 > On 03/04/2015 08:22 PM, Jan D. wrote: >> Hi. >=20 >> I'm afraid it is out of Emacs control. >=20 > Since the gtk interface has some issues, is there anything really = worth > in it compared to lucid? I switched to the gtk port only when debian > make it default, getting the impression that lucid was receiving less > love. Maybe rendering through gdk is faster? >=20 > Pure curiosity. The toolbar, scrollbar and possibly menus look better. There is a font = chooser and a file dialog. The dialogs look a bit better. Also, they adapt to the desktop theme. Gtk+ does rendering via cairo nowdays, it is not faster, but a bit = slower actually than pure X that lucid uses. Lucid only receives some updates to cope with changed coding standards = and core Emacs changes. The last new stuff was antialiased text in menus, and that was 4 years = ago. I think XEmacs Lucid version has more features, but I haven't = investigated. Jan D.