From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kristofer@hjelmtorp.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintenance of cobol-mode.el on ELPA Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 12:51:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <630147729.98482.1716202310635@office.mailbox.org> References: <417309446.496259.1714679843010@office.mailbox.org> <877cgba1ss.fsf@posteo.net> <1325384861.77317.1714904839820@office.mailbox.org> <87wmo8nyd1.fsf@posteo.net> <1112921232.105999.1714936955847@office.mailbox.org> <87cyq02gxl.fsf@posteo.net> <981312274.219842.1715024685288@office.mailbox.org> <87le4m7lsq.fsf@posteo.net> <875xv99e70.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37411"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Andrea Corallo , Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 20 12:54:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s90eg-0009Wb-3H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 May 2024 12:54:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s90dt-00019r-Tn; Mon, 20 May 2024 06:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s90cY-0000XT-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2024 06:51:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::201]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s90cV-00038P-VH; Mon, 20 May 2024 06:51:57 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VjZBb1Z6dz9sSN; Mon, 20 May 2024 12:51:51 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Received-SPF: none client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::201; envelope-from=kristofer@hjelmtorp.se; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 May 2024 06:53:20 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319404 Archived-At: > On 05/20/2024 8:57 AM CEST Andrea Corallo wrote: > > > Philip Kaludercic writes: > > > Philip Kaludercic writes: > > > >>>> > I have created a new repository not at sourcehut; > >>>> > https://git.sr.ht/~hjelmtech/cobol-mode, and made one commit to > >>>> > change the maintainer. > >>>> > > >>>> > Does it look good, or should I change something? > >>>> > >>>> It looks good to me, and the ELPA build system isn't complaining either. > >>>> If you are ready and there are do objections, I can update elpa.git to > >>>> mirror your repository. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'm ready! Though I still have not received confirmation from FSF on > >>> the paperwork, but I do have signed and sent them in. > >> > >> Oh, I misunderstood that. In that case we have to wait anyway. Ping me > >> when it's done, I assume that anyone with comments on the issue will > >> have had enough time to send a message until then. > > > > Ping? Any updates here? > > I don't see Kristofer in the copyright file ATM. > > So Kristofer I think would be good if you could ping FSF, if don't > succedee let me know and I can contact them to understand what's going > on. > > Thanks > > Andrea I sent another email to FSF to hear how it is going. I'll let you know if I don't get any response in a following days. Kristofer