From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: TheFlyingDutchman <zzbbaadd@aol.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: What's your favourite *under_publicized* editing feature
	ofEmacs?
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <62fb097e-cce0-486c-be6b-c57579f586d9@o21g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
References: <ae23d097-ee87-41b1-9bd9-f74c6cbbd1aa@l22g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<ik1q3q$j4k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87ei6zpbor.fsf@rapttech.com.au>
	<2p8vx4550z.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <ika571$o63$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<jwvr5au7dwv.fsf-monnier+gnu.emacs.help@gnu.org>
	<ikcqgk$sgl$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<87lj11dhm9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <ikdqii$33d$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<87pqqda3a4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <ikdrtt$87c$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<slrniml2ei.mua.jcb@krk.inf.ed.ac.uk>
	<ikedtp$ko1$1@news.eternal-september.org>
	<ikee5o$ogf$5@speranza.aioe.org> <87d3md89mh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<ikehlf$34k$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<jwvsjv84y6q.fsf-monnier+gnu.emacs.help@gnu.org>
	<87pqqclc38.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <ikgo37$9r6$4@speranza.aioe.org>
	<87aahghqod.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <ikhd9h$ik$3@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298940067 8852 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2011 00:41:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:41:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 01 01:41:04 2011
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1PuDe9-0002y9-QK
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:41:01 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51679 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1PuDe9-0005oM-0n
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:41:01 -0500
Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!o21g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs
Original-Lines: 6
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.36.149.131
Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298938441 15794 127.0.0.1 (1 Mar 2011 00:14:01
	GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:14:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o21g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.36.149.131;
	posting-account=9bWHAAoAAAAxSFC_2O_ssTETNW9NhMbW
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	Trident/4.0; GTB6.6; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729;
	.NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C;
	AskTbBT5/5.9.1.14019),gzip(gfe)
Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu comp.lang.lisp:300098 gnu.emacs.help:185440
	comp.emacs:101184
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:79591
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/79591>

>
> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> with Lisp, Kastrup?

Can you be more specific? In what way was it unsubstantiated? How was
it erroneous? What made it classic?