Re: Can we support apt's funky ANSI escapes?

["Clément Pit--Claudel" <clement.pit@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 909 bytes --]

On 2016-07-22 16:54, Matthew Carter wrote:
> Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pit@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2016-07-20 13:05, Robert Weiner wrote:
>>> What happens if you use {M-x ansi-term RET}?
>>
>> I guess it would work fine, but I'd rather not use ansi-term, if possible.
>>
> 
> The ansi-color package has a function, #'ansi-color-apply-on-region
> which works well for translating these to colorized font faces (I use it
> on some shell output from my own custom functions that include these
> escape codes).

Hmm, I'm not sure I understand. shell-mode already translates most ANSI escapes to colorized faces, doesn't it?
For example, in emacs -Q, running M-x shell and typing `env TERM=xterm ls --color' gives me properly colored output.

AFAICT, the only thing that's missing is support for the two specific codes (61 and 62) that `apt' is using. Isn't that right?

Clément.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]