From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruno BARBIER Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: edebug-spec of setf: why is the getter evaluated on set? Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:09:45 +0100 Message-ID: <61ebe1d2.1c69fb81.8e10c.e9d3@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37168"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 22 11:54:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBE2b-0009Vl-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 11:54:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38258 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBE2Z-0004dn-Os for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 05:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBE08-0003dx-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 05:52:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::434] (port=35678 helo=mail-wr1-x434.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBE07-0003uh-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 05:52:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id r14so4379365wrp.2 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 02:52:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version; bh=I/ttFB0S/0DdO5pdsr3zFRiaYapdKJc2HzNuTNl89wE=; b=jE+Fm5CMn0xV6TWxzm1BP8UvKOU5X2QR1dOMUEWQM0XU25ffR+oEn8dyp9A3zvEU/g ZKeMcOfzA/f+pB9UVYjEbRNXj6vYSevcpTmWQ3IaXbowF+pqjWoS3pORMdtjJ6bKHJzn xSqDGF1rlqUCXdZ4+WsKWes1m9Lae1/9UaaHHTDvT4fYbEWoBqYLuK55nxzCDZnHmg+C VDhgbiUfpB/NiaW1bCgUVwF2ApFwjIeFRgcMhWlfyh/tpL1DVmprm+k3MatsFmbLzzj7 0UINJI6WBCSFRpLIRN7iJBBLg3u3T8wyJYjJzMmAD/kW2CfH/IuA7HsRrlsY9P9O4+Ut 0JZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version; bh=I/ttFB0S/0DdO5pdsr3zFRiaYapdKJc2HzNuTNl89wE=; b=Csho+HRQwnRYJpbv8fIpw6nLlq1QrEiQ/Iwa+7fk6p0ehKazTHq3XSe3eAfE7c08Fu ozurXExAwqVipBacr4oAL+hf/zY6Vv1FApCx1FdWAaff6ptG36wgRGngETaAe8MTcNKW koMGRRVCNLxwAdVqKoe1dF+xJjq5sLDFvERc97l5HuRlWtOkeT9DPZTsfhrgEPpc2+pm cKLxB52R1Qtq6xS7OVqM28U7qQ9bzaJWkhWEnBieGOAUkrZ1ulTHpziBHXksRwMEz2FW N/fE9+YGSYstS5aay6kKye2S5cBKp3IGbDlA91pIIMrx/LgcEf3xEfrBZM971ftEg7Zy 42eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ti0iNxaGIn/rvPCjueWOKJSmsgvi5bXfUKs03+bIvybAZR/M8 OfpGshwMrWhme7A84NnbVUvTYf3i2Qc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzsbo2aKFjyYsfSeMIOaBcLBkNhZiFTMGKO9jMb/DH1eRU3xKDPWvawRrsnzVrmzxZC2oesmA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1847:: with SMTP id c7mr7251467wri.208.1642848722382; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 02:52:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from tosh-laptop ([2a01:e0a:505:3460:1a16:a0c4:3f89:c0d9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm12793418wmj.13.2022.01.22.02.52.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 Jan 2022 02:52:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by tosh-laptop (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:09:45 +0100 X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::434 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::434; envelope-from=brubar.cs@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x434.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285191 Archived-At: Hi, I'm using the gv package (and setf). I really like it. But, I don't understand why the GETTER is evaluated, when edebugging a 'setf' expression. For example, let's take that expression: #+begin_src elisp (setf my:undefined 7) #+end_src and let's assume the symbol "my:undefined" doesn't exist yet (that is, "not interned"). Evaluating that expression with edebug raises the error: Symbol's value as variable is void: my:undefined Evaluating that same expression outside of edebug, just sets the variable, as expected. In other words, the debug spec of 'setf' currently is: (&rest [gv-place form]) shouldn't it be something like: (&rest [sexp form]) or is it a bug in how 'gv-place' is handled ? Thanks, Bruno. PS: If it matters, I'm using GNU Emacs 27.2