From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment? Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:39:21 -0800 Message-ID: <61B14D03B48D4D9E998771D3B7E4252C@us.oracle.com> References: <81d37z271c.fsf@gmail.com> <87626i2i4r.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354657206 26330 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2012 21:40:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11095@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" , "'Jambunathan K'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 04 22:40:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0Dx-0000Wi-VM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:40:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40698 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0Dk-0005Nn-5y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0Dg-0005Ik-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:40:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0Df-0006C5-Ey for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:40:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0Df-0006Bw-CE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:39:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0Di-0005SV-HH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11095 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11095-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11095.135465717420946 (code B ref 11095); Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11095) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2012 21:39:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0DG-0005Rl-6J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:36430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg0DE-0005Re-9E for 11095@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qB4LdQbg030924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:39:27 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB4LdQRr001052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:39:26 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt119.oracle.com (abhmt119.oracle.com [141.146.116.71]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qB4LdPfd019804; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:39:25 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.232.171) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:39:25 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Ac3SZG4jw10MLx6BTkWhMT+3yHcoKQAAut6Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67922 Archived-At: > > -(defface hi-yellow > > +(defface hi-lock-1 > > I'm not sure it's an improvement. When choosing a face in > hi-lock-face-buffer, "hi-lock-1" doesn't speak much to me contrary to > "hi-yellow". Not specifically related to this face, but it is a bad idea, in general (no doubt there are exceptions), for a face name to advertize particular face attributes, such as the color. The color is presumably something that the user can customize, and is typically not something that speaks to the use or meaning of the face.