From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Jelten Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs segfaults when handling wrong_type_argument backtrace Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:41:50 +0200 Message-ID: <6178cb5d-e31a-0851-8dbf-cb7be08e8542@sft.lol> References: <2c65531c-2d9c-3c1d-bc2a-5666a7de0a38@sft.lol> <83zg7u6cs3.fsf@gnu.org> <838rfe5y68.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34060"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 18:42:23 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1phvLz-0008fb-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:42:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phvLb-0004SE-Kc; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phvLa-0004S1-1N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from blergh.sft.lol ([2a03:4000:6:329c::42] helo=mailrelay0.sft.lol) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phvLX-0005zr-VY; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from jjserver.sft.lol (ip5b42c34d.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [91.66.195.77]) (Authenticated sender: jjservermail@mailrelay0.sft.mx) by mailrelay0.sft.lol (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE051205D1; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:41:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [IPV6:2a09:80c0:94::54] (mo01.ciip.cit.tum.de [IPv6:2a09:80c0:94::54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by jjserver.sft.lol (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1110EA40FE8; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:41:51 +0200 (CEST) Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <838rfe5y68.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a03:4000:6:329c::42; envelope-from=jj@sft.lol; helo=mailrelay0.sft.lol X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304877 Archived-At: On 2023-03-30 12:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: Jonas Jelten , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:36:25 +0000 >> >> Eli if we want to avoid spurious bug reports due to stale eln-cache we >> can also increment ABI_VERSION in comp.c. Not sure is something we want >> to do tho. Please let me know if you think is appropriate in this case. > > I don't think we need to increment ABI_VERSION to avoid bug reports, > no. Yes, that places additional burden on my and your shoulders > (perhaps mainly on yours), but bumping the ABI_VERSION has its own > downsides (e.g., it requires recompilation of all the preloaded > files), and I don't think this is justified. People who track > development versions and use that for production sessions will have to > be prepared to clean up their eln-cache from time to time, when > changes like this one are made. > After clearing the cache it seems to work, thanks, that was easy. I assumed that changes in the abi would result in a version bump :) Shouldn't recompilation of files happen in such a case rather than random crashes, though? Or ar there other, more complicated downsides? Cheers -- Jonas