From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Shrinking frames as of past month Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:33:51 +0200 Message-ID: <6161f3180803280233h7b4b9f3bn9bee4c0a610928da@mail.gmail.com> References: <47E4F3A7.1080305@swipnet.se> <87bq552k9h.fsf@grepfind.mwolson.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206697110 2211 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2008 09:38:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Michael Olson" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 28 10:39:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JfB36-0005Oy-LX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:39:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JfB2U-0008H8-SH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JfAyE-0006WO-Bl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JfAyA-0006V0-Mb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JfAyA-0006UT-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.190]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfAy9-0006Gp-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so157036rvf.6 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:33:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jQ8h+nqQfeS6j+4kqOMUiFLVWLaZYNHM1IZJzSlD62w=; b=sWnBG/WkAEj23mt6Spk3jlr3UWVz/7ALLL8wyvGBTXKNwpz2HVrJY7/XY52ANaRha45lJlAKH4jj3tvnmO9kFpYon4/7uPs06TEE1mU0x/VUrToCpDB+U2pUQJ2cYctKw09sZwJb90+bSZL2wnuofcYlkubH0gN7It7CiCY0bd4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=H9tDv9BZhlVfUDBgww8D4/xFLh75MFkGJabpqeRfQtL56nebEttb2NU+vxLKQxfn0rUv39WTY5KiLwzT9/NoIl3Zw78eTkb5hvsTJngt/jUp4rMfD84HPnjc/T6yN1qCokuyD8OVa23mEiixWy0zLKOoJ8u5QE8+t+/snx9idgg= Original-Received: by 10.140.180.13 with SMTP id c13mr1174524rvf.153.1206696831833; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.140.141.11 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:33:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bq552k9h.fsf@grepfind.mwolson.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93687 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Michael Olson wrote: > Jan Dj=E4rv writes: > > > > It seems it is a bug in Gtk+, > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68668 > > (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D137822 explains it a bit > > better). > > > > Basically because the menu bar is too large for the frame, Gtk+ sets a > > base width that isn't a multiple of the width increment. This makes > > the window manager shrink the text area (by 2 pixels in my case) so > > that framw width - base width is a multiple of the width increment. > > Then when leaving dired, we get a correct base width again. But the 2 > > pixels aren't put back, rather the window manager shrinks even more to > > get the frame to be a multiple of the width increment. > > That sounds plausible. I updated the rest of my system today, and the > problem went away, so it seems to have been the fault of GTK. > Could you say, which version of GTK you updated to? Reason: I have lates stable (gtk-2.12.9) but problem didn't gone. --=20 Andrew W. Nosenko