From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68570: 29.1; recompile might not re-use project-compile's buffer Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:33:00 +0200 Message-ID: <60842df3-8a64-4bde-b6d6-f94b9a964a17@gutov.dev> References: <920b0c20-c6ee-4b41-84ec-5adfa06c64a2@jbornemann.de> <320b09d1-2af4-4110-bdf3-94da122f3dd6@gutov.dev> <86il3m1zi7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33111"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Bornemann , 68570@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 21 19:34:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rRceB-0008Jn-OM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:34:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRcdt-0007Oz-Ff; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:34:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRcdr-0007OC-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:33:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRcdq-00054R-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:33:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRcdt-00023A-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:34:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 18:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68570 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68570-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68570.17058619957822 (code B ref 68570); Sun, 21 Jan 2024 18:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68570) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2024 18:33:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRcd8-000226-Ta for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:33:15 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53733) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRcd6-00021r-DQ for 68570@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:33:13 -0500 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4957E5C0095; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:33:03 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:33:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1705861983; x=1705948383; bh=JPSUl77XEE99dvdiQloE1RO9FHBGV+N4/MbDHGJUCDY=; b= mKyxd9Uf2VboFqCPk8QNlwrtN0aZFBqZBK7DJtHUuVvMd16W0QjLI+iEJQbUtPxK YpVJ4odU/5xx1hilOy9CR5Vti0bp5f/yV75d51tidhCNGkPZCrq4YpB31ai96eIF sZ9dIPsrKm5upwfQXl6hQcuE9QFJGhsC515GyjsTdCKHfzNz2Zb5dgkWGU0Z9k/s zGVE7+Pr1rAtKnTmd5LW78UuCgre7ytXPR4lsdOC/mnCQRNIATmyKgOND1RJRZeD GFvxSHAJDY9NtzWHuEIaifPR2t2Zzn7mkIwXq5uf7qEiDOWxN/QybNrcF4Y2gUKp B8XxmZVyKLCwTXjO79s9wA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1705861983; x= 1705948383; bh=JPSUl77XEE99dvdiQloE1RO9FHBGV+N4/MbDHGJUCDY=; b=I PKdwUU6Ffk8QJh1RKh/yxwCxCYj1dD+LwjMBnHXgyAxsbbOzxv+b0MdCGoY7BxH7 MvF2ouwNTUBCNvhfHs059/RFTQQt0LCqZX/yiblpu36okzj6JHHc8PdcKAkoz0uS XfCns3g57HqNPlYDYkwHiOKrJ+lrVlj/aEXSrJLSrzE9gtqwYOPKYEUWFj0WOgH/ awtdnnA0frlDgQSzOLHs39HvqWpyrabN2Q4U6VTj/GHT9IqXvX6Tm0kdmnPbD/WE LjLQHl+60p4A/xfNmNHos9XHWrQfFgy6yYQ1cjHpCRFoaM+evPWgxsJDCNXaNoVm yaIKBahTuBjgeNGPdnB2Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdekgedgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthejredttddvjeenucfhrhhomhepffhm ihhtrhihucfiuhhtohhvuceoughmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeetudeljeegheetgfehgeejkeeuhedvveeikeeufedtvddtveefhfdvveeg udejheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe gumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:33:02 -0500 (EST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86il3m1zi7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278680 Archived-At: On 21/01/2024 20:18, Juri Linkov wrote: >>> Although I'm thinking by now that it might be more consistent to have >>> a separate project-recompile command in addition to >>> recompile. >> I've pushed to master a new command called that (commit 0a07603ae8d), like >> discussed on the mailing list. > Shouldn't now 'g' in project buffers use 'project-recompile'? I don't know if it should - AFAICS 'M-x recompile' doesn't rename the current buffer, so it seems like the current behavior is already correct.