From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18381: 24.3.93; Diary can wrongly be displayed in Calendar's window Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:40:47 -0400 Message-ID: <5zoauvymww.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87k35nqtdd.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <54085AC5.5050304@gmx.at> <7lr3zrjm94.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <64a96fko3d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409874078 3980 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2014 23:41:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Berman , 18381@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 01:41:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPgeK-0006gI-Fn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:41:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54618 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPgeJ-00069D-UD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPgeG-00067y-4q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPgeF-0000FV-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPgeF-0000FR-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPgeD-0007sK-Od for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 23:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18381-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18381.140987405130249 (code B ref 18381); Thu, 04 Sep 2014 23:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2014 23:40:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59148 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPge2-0007ro-U8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:40:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:44950 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPge0-0007rg-HH for 18381@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPgdz-0006gh-F8; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:40:47 -0400 X-Spook: SP4 STARLAN Area 51 Armani Ft. Meade Crowell Agfa X-Ran: F{aTuv+,3~ERdZ=R{MPXqg@%%zIyXg\Yj8(a?v>4!l\V=,ZRj`ZllZ`N|*#o!9`!V@%,q} X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <64a96fko3d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:39:02 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93047 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > Following works, but having to use `ignore' seems odd? Oh, apparently `nil' works too.