From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Another question on the W32 port Date: 22 Mar 2003 00:39:55 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xznnoz3uc.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1048287112 29007 80.91.224.249 (21 Mar 2003 22:51:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 21 23:51:50 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18wVMc-0007Xa-00 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:51:50 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18wVOY-0005qI-00 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:53:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18wVGg-0006pl-0A for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18wVDU-0003uO-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:42:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18wVDA-0003cK-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18wVCD-0002vk-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 915337C012; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:41:04 +0100 (CET) Original-To: jasonr@gnu.org Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:12522 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:12522 I was looking at glyph_rect in X and W32, and noticed that they are significantly different due to the following change: 2002-02-18 Jason Rumney * w32term.c (glyph_rect): Determine the row and glyph more precisely. Now I wonder why that change was not back-ported to the X version? Was there a specific W32 problem that was related to this, or can the new W32 version be used on X too (modulo the differences in rectangle implementation) ? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk