From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: C-h C-t should show the TODO
Date: 01 May 2002 23:20:31 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <5xvga7o99c.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
References: <ap3r8kwpd9j.fsf@fosters.umd.edu>
	<5567-Wed01May2002193158+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
	<ap3pu0fx0u5.fsf@fosters.umd.edu>
	<4331-Wed01May2002205844+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020284476 2552 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2002 20:21:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 20:21:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 1730bD-0000f3-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 22:21:15 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 1730g6-0004wq-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 22:26:18 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 1730b1-0006CY-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 16:21:03 -0400
Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 1730Zn-00068T-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 16:19:47 -0400
Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3])
	by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 7AE307C035; Wed,  1 May 2002 20:19:43 +0000 (GMT)
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <4331-Wed01May2002205844+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Original-Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3491
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3491

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:

> > From: "D. Goel" <deego@glue.umd.edu>
> > Date: 01 May 2002 12:57:38 -0400
> > 
> > so what do you think of the C-h C-t --> TODO suggestion? 
> 
> I don't have an opinion, so I'll defer to others.  (In general, TODO
> is something for the developers, so I'm not sure C-h C-t is
> necessary.)

Neither do I.

IMO, there are already too many bindings in the C-h map...

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk