From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline Date: 01 Mar 2002 18:54:05 +0100 Message-ID: <5xofi8rx6q.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <20020228092109.6CF5.LEKTU@terra.es> <20020228121951.6D00.LEKTU@terra.es> <5x1yf53hnr.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200203010111.g211BA320156@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015005548 31654 195.204.10.66 (1 Mar 2002 17:59:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Mar 2002 17:59:08 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16grJD-0008ES-00 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 18:59:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16grEP-0003zX-00; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 12:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16grDL-0003sl-00 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 12:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (unknown [10.1.82.3]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 810377C049 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 17:53:01 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200203010111.g211BA320156@aztec.santafe.edu> Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1677 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1677 Richard Stallman writes: > What about changing the buffer name rather than the mode-line-process, ie. > > *IELM on test.el* > > or > > *IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero** > > In case there is more than one IELM buffer pointing at the same > long-named buffer, it would be important to uniquify the names in > a somewhat special way. The difference between > *IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero** and > *IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero**<2> > would not be visible in the mode line. > *IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero** and *IELM<2> on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero** would be better. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel