From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.. Date: 30 Aug 2002 14:07:51 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xlm6oim7c.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208271621.g7RGLNm30516@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xhehfe3aj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xn0r5hgl3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030705742 26798 127.0.0.1 (30 Aug 2002 11:09:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17kje8-0006y7-00 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:09:00 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17kkAr-0001wM-00 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:42:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17kjfK-0002Lg-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17kjcq-0002Ac-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17kjcn-0002AQ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17kjcm-0002AL-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 07AA07C016; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:07:28 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7156 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7156 Miles Bader writes: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > > I implemented Miles suggestion that C-x e end and executes the macro. > > This is done by binding C-x e to kmacro-end-or-call-macro. > > BTW, is there any reason to change the names of all these functions? The old names are the built-in C functions. I still need those for interfacing to the actual definition and execution of keyboard macros. Of course, I could change the names of the C functions, but then other existing code interfacing to these functions could break. > > If your code is better, why not replace the old functions? If... ? :-) > > There's presumably people out there using the old names, and since the > new functions are backward-compatible, they'd be a drop-in-replacement. For non-interactive use they are not completely backwards compatible. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk