From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\_ patch Date: 12 Feb 2003 14:00:05 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xk7g5slgq.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200302060106.TAA21443@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <5xel6lu3lh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xadh9tyt3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xr8akid8n.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5x1y2ge1tl.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045052284 2324 80.91.224.249 (12 Feb 2003 12:18:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ivpx-0000b5-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:18:01 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18iw1u-0006wb-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:30:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ivpP-0005Df-09 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:17:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ivlZ-0004My-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:13:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ivlA-000418-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ivZS-0001PW-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:00:59 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B9787C012; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:00:56 +0100 (CET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11588 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11588 Richard Stallman writes: > > This might be a good idea if we combine it with the feature that it is > > an error to put a digit or a symbol character or # after a character > > constant with no space in between. > > There are several places where something like '(? ?...) or '(?\ ?...) > is used, i.e. where no additional space separates the "? " character > from the "?" of the next character. > > Looking closely, there is no overlap between these cases and the ones > I said should be an error. Ok. So I assume that you want ?XY to be invalid syntax unless Y is <= 040 or one of " ' ; ( ) [ ] ? or # -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk