From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\_ patch Date: 13 Feb 2003 15:19:53 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5xadh0l0ty.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> References: <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200302060106.TAA21443@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <5xel6lu3lh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xadh9tyt3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xr8akid8n.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5x1y2ge1tl.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xk7g5slgq.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045142731 14271 80.91.224.249 (13 Feb 2003 13:25:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18jJJA-0003Rr-00 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:21:44 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18jJVd-0004al-00 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:34:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18jJKc-00059X-0E for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18jJKG-000573-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:22:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18jJKE-00056L-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:22:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.filanet.dk ([195.215.206.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18jJIH-0004Ei-00; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:20:50 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs2.cua.dk.cua.dk (kfs2.local.filanet.dk [192.168.1.182]) by mail.filanet.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 837067C012; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:20:44 +0100 (CET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11622 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11622 Richard Stallman writes: > Ok. So I assume that you want ?XY to be invalid syntax > unless Y is <= 040 or one of " ' ; ( ) [ ] ? or # > > That is the idea. I can see how someone could have written (?a(b)) > and think it legitimate, but a person could hardly argue that (?ab) > instead of (?a b) is legitimate. > > It's possible there is some other syntax char I have forgotten > that should be legitimate there too. If you can think of one, > please add it. I have installed the changes. Edward O'Connor suggested to modify checkdoc to look for ?\ at the end of lines and replace them with the new syntax. That's a good idea, but I have not done this. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk