From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CL package serious deficiencies Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:00 -0500 Message-ID: <5tr4y6z2pv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <33271707.post@talk.nabble.com> <87fwemcwlx.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87zkcubbfc.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87vcnibb9t.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328654474 1397 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 22:41:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: egnarts-ms , Lennart Borgman , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nix Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 23:41:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rutin-0006c9-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:41:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46408 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rutin-00046L-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rutig-000461-Bi for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rutif-0006OM-9c for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rutif-0006OI-84 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rutie-0007AC-64; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:00 -0500 X-Spook: George W. Bush SWAT MD2 MD5 Aldergrove MIT-LL Ruby Ridge X-Ran: R3?xAA)R2E.fx+G4:usxf!;H8+qIAvebRZI\n"1W7mTuk_wR{p`W,Z#ctDiA((DJefhuw0 X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87vcnibb9t.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (nix@esperi.org.uk's message of "Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:10:06 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148326 Archived-At: Nix wrote: > Well, if you find out what the problems are, I'll see about fixing them. You could look at http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5644 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6583 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7070 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7604 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8841 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9103 if you want something to do (send any follow-ups to the relevant bug address, not here). Though it won't hasten Emacs 24.1 at all, so is not the most useful thing to be doing right now. Also none of these have any relevance to whether cl is acceptable to use at run-time.