From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier " Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Finding C style comments using isearch-forward-regexp Date: 19 Feb 2003 14:46:26 -0500 Organization: Yale University Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5lu1f0rr3h.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <84lm0c9x1e.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045684656 632 80.91.224.249 (19 Feb 2003 19:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18laLX-0000A1-00 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:57:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18laJs-0003o5-00 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:55:52 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.ycc.yale.edu!rum.cs.yale.edu!rum.cs.yale.edu Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 9 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: rum.cs.yale.edu User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: rum.cs.yale.edu X-Original-Trace: 19 Feb 2003 14:46:26 -0500, rum.cs.yale.edu Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:110400 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:6902 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:6902 >>>>> "Timur" == Timur Aydin writes: > Hmm, that seems like a workaround. But the mentioned regexp not > working indicates a bug in the emacs regexp handler, doesn't it? A shortcoming, yes, a bug, I don't think so: it's inherent to the technique used to do the matching (i.e. backtracking). Stefan