From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier " Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: save-excursion doesn't always work Date: 16 Dec 2002 13:28:11 -0500 Organization: Yale University Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <5lpts1es3o.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <1a52e3d.0212142138.2f5aed8@posting.google.com> <5l7keaeyuy.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5lu1hdew66.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1040064086 8157 80.91.224.249 (16 Dec 2002 18:41:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18O0BB-00027R-00 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:41:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18O0AP-0008SG-04 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:40:37 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.ycc.yale.edu!rum.cs.yale.edu!rum.cs.yale.edu Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 15 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: rum.cs.yale.edu User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: rum.cs.yale.edu X-Original-Trace: 16 Dec 2002 13:28:11 -0500, rum.cs.yale.edu Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:108181 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:4710 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:4710 >>>>> "David" == David Kastrup writes: > Come off it. Nobody uses M-q as a substitute for forward-paragraph on > filled text. It is a text-changing command. I don't think people > will complain much if it changes text. They will complain if regions > and marks end up on the wrong side of (maybe adjusted) white space, > though. _Regardless_ of whether there were indeed formatting changes > or not. I have no clue what makes you think I disagree with you. I though I made it pretty clear that my comment was only an answer to your implicit question about whether Emacs' default filling code had solved that problem. Stefan