* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf [not found] <E1SOlnR-0008J2-HL@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> @ 2012-04-30 11:43 ` Stefan Monnier 2012-04-30 16:12 ` Glenn Morris 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2012-04-30 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: emacs-devel Was there a good reason why we keep those generated files in under revision control? Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-04-30 11:43 ` [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf Stefan Monnier @ 2012-04-30 16:12 ` Glenn Morris 2012-04-30 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-04-30 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel Stefan Monnier wrote: > Was there a good reason why we keep those generated files in under > revision control? Deja vu. :) http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg00008.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-04-30 16:12 ` Glenn Morris @ 2012-04-30 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier 2012-05-01 0:18 ` Glenn Morris 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2012-04-30 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: emacs-devel >> Was there a good reason why we keep those generated files in under >> revision control? > Deja vu. :) > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg00008.html Duh! It's even in the README file. Sorry, Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-04-30 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier @ 2012-05-01 0:18 ` Glenn Morris 2012-05-01 5:33 ` Leo 2012-05-01 12:28 ` Juanma Barranquero 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-05-01 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel Personally, I think it would be fine these days to treat the refcard pdfs like the info files. Don't keep them in the repo, but include them in the release tarfiles (just need to make make-dist gripe/build them if they are not found in the source tree). Every halfway modern GNU/Linux system has suitable (optional) TeX packages. And it's not like these pdfs have real changes very often. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-05-01 0:18 ` Glenn Morris @ 2012-05-01 5:33 ` Leo 2012-05-01 8:27 ` Bastien 2012-05-01 12:28 ` Juanma Barranquero 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Leo @ 2012-05-01 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-devel On 2012-05-01 08:18 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > Personally, I think it would be fine these days to treat the refcard > pdfs like the info files. Don't keep them in the repo, but include them > in the release tarfiles (just need to make make-dist gripe/build them if > they are not found in the source tree). Every halfway modern GNU/Linux > system has suitable (optional) TeX packages. And it's not like these > pdfs have real changes very often. I agree. Leo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-05-01 5:33 ` Leo @ 2012-05-01 8:27 ` Bastien 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bastien @ 2012-05-01 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leo; +Cc: emacs-devel Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes: > On 2012-05-01 08:18 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: >> Personally, I think it would be fine these days to treat the refcard >> pdfs like the info files. Don't keep them in the repo, but include them >> in the release tarfiles (just need to make make-dist gripe/build them if >> they are not found in the source tree). Every halfway modern GNU/Linux >> system has suitable (optional) TeX packages. And it's not like these >> pdfs have real changes very often. > > I agree. FWIW I do agree too. -- Bastien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-05-01 0:18 ` Glenn Morris 2012-05-01 5:33 ` Leo @ 2012-05-01 12:28 ` Juanma Barranquero 2012-05-01 16:21 ` Glenn Morris 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2012-05-01 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, emacs-devel On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 02:18, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote: > Don't keep them in the repo, but include them > in the release tarfiles (just need to make make-dist gripe/build them if > they are not found in the source tree). That will add complexity to building releases for Windows, I think. Juanma ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-05-01 12:28 ` Juanma Barranquero @ 2012-05-01 16:21 ` Glenn Morris 2012-05-01 16:24 ` Juanma Barranquero 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-05-01 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, emacs-devel Juanma Barranquero wrote: >> Don't keep them in the repo, but include them >> in the release tarfiles (just need to make make-dist gripe/build them if >> they are not found in the source tree). > > That will add complexity to building releases for Windows, I think. Surely building releases for MS Windows (or any platform) must start from the release tarfile. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf 2012-05-01 16:21 ` Glenn Morris @ 2012-05-01 16:24 ` Juanma Barranquero 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2012-05-01 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, emacs-devel On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 18:21, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote: > Surely building releases for MS Windows (or any platform) must start > from the release tarfile. I mean, building from the source tree, or building the release tarfiles. I do that, and I would have to install additional software to be able to regenerate the PDFs. As we agree that they change only rarely, there's no urge to remove them from bzr, IMO. Juanma ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-01 16:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1SOlnR-0008J2-HL@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
2012-04-30 11:43 ` [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf Stefan Monnier
2012-04-30 16:12 ` Glenn Morris
2012-04-30 20:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-05-01 0:18 ` Glenn Morris
2012-05-01 5:33 ` Leo
2012-05-01 8:27 ` Bastien
2012-05-01 12:28 ` Juanma Barranquero
2012-05-01 16:21 ` Glenn Morris
2012-05-01 16:24 ` Juanma Barranquero
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.